COGNITIVE AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LITERARY DIALOGUE

Admin bo'lib kirish (www.admin.slib.uz)

Tizim sinov (TEST) rejimida ishlamoqda! Murojat uchun @slib_support

Eski talqinga o'tish link

28 апрел 2023

Asosiy til:Ingliz

COGNITIVE AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LITERARY DIALOGUE

Fan yo'nalishi:

644b73a445cdc.pdf

PDF

THE LIGHT OF ISLAM

Maqola chop etish see more

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

The following article deals with the concept analysis in the literary dialogue from the perspective of Cognitive and Cultural linguistics. Cognitive and Cultural linguistics are the modern trends of Linguistics as a result of anthropocentric paradigm to language. In this approach, the interaction between the language and human is the main basis of this paradigm. Cognitive and Cultural Linguistics have own main notions as interdisciplinary branches of linguistic sciences and “concept” is considered as one of basic notions of Cognitive and Cultural linguistics as well as being the core of attention of several interdisciplinary branches of linguistics. In this article, concepts Beauty and Love are analyzed according to the study with the notional, image-bearing and evaluative layers. In this regard, two concepts are analyzed according to dictionary defnitions in notional level. The image-bearing and evaluative layers are based on the features of the concept in the extracts of literary dialogues of the texts.

MUALIFLAR

Teglar

# concept# language# literary text# Cognitive linguisics# Cultural linguisics# Antropocentric paradigm# literary dialogue# concept analysis# notional level# imagebearing level

Maqolani baholang

0

0 ta

Maqola idintifikatorlari

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0139/A0423-0090

DOI:

Mavjud emas

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. Ashurova D.U, Galiyeva M.R. (2016). Stylistics of literary text. Tashkent: Turon-Iqbol. 2. Ashurova D.U, Galiyeva M.R.( 2016). Text linguistics. –Tashkent: Turon-Iqbol. 3. Dirk G. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Berlin- New York,. 4. Eshboyeva, D. A. (2014). Eﬀective ways in teaching English language. Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук, (8-1), 312-313. 5. Eshboeva, D. A. (2016). THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF THE LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODOLOGY. Modern Science, (6), 77-79. 6. Evans V., and Green M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburg: Edinburgh university press. 7. Evans Vyvyan & Melanie Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 8. Evans, Vyvyan (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 9. MacCormac E. (1985). A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. - Cambridge: MIT Press,. 10. Vorobyov V.V. (1997). Cultural linguistics (theory and methods). 11. Арутyюнова Н. Д., Падучева Е. В. (1985). Истоки, проблемы и категории прагматики. Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVI. Москва: Прогресс. 12. Ашурова Д.У. (1991). Производное слово в свете коммуникативной теории языка. Ташкент. 13. Демьянко, В.З. Когнитивная лингвистика как разновидность интерпре-тирующего подхода. www. infolex.ru 14. Джумаева Н. Э., Сохибов А. Р. (2014). Педагогические термины и понятия. КАРШИ: Каршинский государственный университет. 70. 15. Кубрякова Е.С. и др. (1996). Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. Москва: МГУ,. 245 с. 16. Маслова В.А. (2001). Лингвокультурология. Москва: Академия,. – 208 с. 17. Попова З. Д., Стернин И. А. (2007). Когнитивная лингвистика. – Москва: Восток Запад. – 314 с. 18. Степанов Ю. (1981). В поисках прагматики (проблема субъекта) – М.: Известия. 19. Шамсематова Б. Р. (2019). Метод проектов на уроках английского языка. Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. №. 2. – С. 96-99. 20. Языкознание. Большой энциклопедический словарь / Гл. ред. В.Н.Ярцева. – 2-е изд. – Я41 – Москва. Большая Российская энциклопедия, 1998.