logo
calendar31 Avgust 2026
view6
Asosiy til:Ingliz

REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES UNDER DUTY-CYCLED OPERATION: COMPACTION, SCALING, BIOFILM REGROWTH AND PERMEATE TRANSIENTS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC-DRIVEN BRACKISH DESALINATION

Fan yo'nalishi:Ko'p tarmoqli
pdf

A-5_29009930.pdf

PDF

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Photovoltaic-driven reverse osmosis is the dominant architecture for decentralised brackish-water supply in arid regions, yet it violates the condition under which almost all membrane performance data are obtained: steady pressure, steady flux and continuous operation. This review assembles the evidence on how the polyamide membrane itself, considered as a mechanical and biological object, responds to duty cycling, and reconciles findings that disagree in sign rather than merely in magnitude. Primary studies published between 2006 and 2026 were coded against a purpose-built parameterisation of non-steady operation comprising duty cycle, stop duration, cycle count, ramp rate, fluctuation amplitude and frequency, minimum-flux floor, idle-state fluid, flush protocol and buffering. Four membrane-side consequences are examined: irreversible compaction and creep recovery across repeated pressurisation; scaling induction time relative to residence time at peak supersaturation; biological regrowth during idle intervals; and permeate-quality transients on restart. Reported outcomes span a permeability loss exceeding fifty per cent after seven days of cycling and no measurable degradation after 1,568 start-stop cycles. Three variables reconcile most of that disagreement: idle-state chemistry, spontaneous osmotic backwash on depressurisation, and the partition between reversible compaction of the active layer and irreversible compaction of the support. No located study varies shutdown duration as a controlled independent variable against a biological endpoint on a membrane, and an experimental design closing that gap is specified.

MUALLIFLAR

M.Kuralov

"O‘ZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI FANLAR AKADEMIYASI S A AZIMOV NOMIDAGI FIZIKA-TEXNIKA INSTITUTI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

J.Akhatov

"O‘ZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI FANLAR AKADEMIYASI S A AZIMOV NOMIDAGI FIZIKA-TEXNIKA INSTITUTI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

Teglar

# operation# membrane# intermittent# compaction# desalination# reverse# osmosis# photovoltaic# biofouling

O'XSHASH MAQOLALAR

SHU JURNALDAGI BOSHQA MAQOLALAR

Maqolani baholang

0
0 ta baho
5
4
3
2
1

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. Abdelkawi, A. A., Lindsey, J. L., & Wright, N. C. (2025). Prediction of gypsum induction time to inform scaling kinetics using machine learning and Smoluchowski theory. Desalination, 616, Article 119288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119288 2. Abdelkawi, A. A., Lindsey, J. L., & Wright, N. C. (2026). A survival analysis framework for predicting gypsum scaling risk in dynamically concentrating desalination systems. Water Research, 304, Article 126345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.126345 3. Alkhouzaam, A., & Khraisheh, M. (2026). Field-realistic accelerated aging protocol for spiral-wound reverse osmosis membranes: Multi-scale diagnostics and end-of-life criteria. Desalination, 628, Article 120071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2026.120071 4. Almetwally, E. M., Elazab, M., Kabeel, A., Yasser, Y., & Elgebaly, A. (2025). Solar powered reverse osmosis desalination: A systematic review of technologies, integration strategies and challenges. Desalination, 615, Article 119228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119228 5. ASTM International. (2019). Standard terminology used for microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis membrane processes (ASTM D6161-19). ASTM International. 6. ASTM International. (2023). Standard test methods for operating characteristics of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration devices (ASTM D4194-23). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4194-23 7. Aybar, H. S., Akhatov, J. S., Avezova, N. R., & Halimov, A. S. (2010). Solar powered RO desalination: Investigations on pilot project of PV powered RO desalination system. Applied Solar Energy, 46(4), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X10040080 8. Boussouga, Y.-A., Richards, B. S., & Schäfer, A. I. (2021). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: System resilience under solar irradiance fluctuations during the treatment of fluoride-rich natural waters by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 617, 118452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118452 9. Burlace, L., & Davies, P. (2022). Fouling and fouling mitigation in batch reverse osmosis: Review and outlook. Desalination and Water Treatment, 249, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28103 10. Cai, Y.-H., Boussouga, Y.-A., & Schäfer, A. I. (2024). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Impact of intermittency on membrane integrity. Desalination, 580, 117504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117504 11. Cai, Y.-H., Burkhardt, C. J., & Schäfer, A. I. (2021). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Impact of osmotic backwash on scaling during solar irradiance fluctuation. Journal of Membrane Science, 619, 118799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118799 12. Cai, Y.-H., Gopalakrishnan, A., Deshmukh, K. P., & Schäfer, A. I. (2022). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Implications of adhesive interaction between membrane and organic matter on spontaneous osmotic backwash cleaning. Water Research, 221, 118752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118752 13. Cai, Y.-H., & Schäfer, A. I. (2020). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Impact of solar irradiance fluctuation on direct osmotic backwash. Journal of Membrane Science, 598, 117666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117666 14. Carta, J. A., Cabrera, P., Melián-Martel, N., & Arenas-Urrea, S. (2025). Experimental investigation of the effect of intermittent operation on membranes in wind-powered SWRO plants, focusing on frequent start-stop scenarios. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 25, Article 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100848 15. Das, T. K., Folley, M., Lamont-Kane, P., & Frost, C. (2024). Performance of a SWRO membrane under variable flow conditions arising from wave powered desalination. Desalination, 571, Article 117069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.117069 16. Davenport, D. M., Ritt, C. L., Verbeke, R., Dickmann, M., Egger, W., Vankelecom, I. F. J., & Elimelech, M. (2020). Thin film composite membrane compaction in high-pressure reverse osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 610, Article 118268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118268 17. Dimitriou, E., Loukatos, D., Arvanitis, K. G., & Papadakis, G. (2025). Experimental evaluation of the performance of a flat sheet reverse osmosis membrane under variable and intermittent operation emulating a photovoltaic-driven desalination system. Water, 17(24), Article 3576. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243576 18. Ding, W., Ma, K., & Childress, A. E. (2024). Compaction of pressure-driven water treatment membranes: Real-time quantification and analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(41), 18404-18413. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c05865 19. DuPont Water Solutions. (2026). Reverse osmosis - Handling, preservation and storage (Technical manual excerpt, Form No. 45-D03716-en, Rev. 11). DuPont de Nemours. 20. Elliott, M. A., DiGiano, F. A., & Sobsey, M. D. (2011). Virus attenuation by microbial mechanisms during the idle time of a household slow sand filter. Water Research, 45(14), 4092-4102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.008 21. Epstein, J. A., & Ramon, G. Z. (2026). Characterizing the permeability of a foulant layer under a transient applied pressure. Journal of Membrane Science, 738, Article 124683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124683 22. Freire-Gormaly, M., & Bilton, A. (2017). An experimental system for characterization of membrane fouling of solar photovoltaic reverse osmosis systems under intermittent operation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 73, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20391 23. Freire-Gormaly, M., & Bilton, A. M. (2018). Experimental quantification of the effect of intermittent operation on membrane performance of solar powered reverse osmosis desalination systems. Desalination, 435, 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.013 24. Freire-Gormaly, M., & Bilton, A. M. (2019a). Design of photovoltaic powered reverse osmosis desalination systems considering membrane fouling caused by intermittent operation. Renewable Energy, 135, 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.065 25. Freire-Gormaly, M., & Bilton, A. M. (2019b). Impact of intermittent operation on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for brackish groundwater desalination systems. Journal of Membrane Science, 583, 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.010 26. Gilron, J., Waisman, M., Daltrophe, N., Pomerantz, N., Milman, M., Ladizhansky, I., & Korin, E. (2006). Prevention of precipitation fouling in NF/RO by reverse flow operation. Desalination, 199(1-3), 29-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.136 27. Hoek, E. M. V., Weigand, T. M., & Edalat, A. (2022). Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling: Causes, consequences and countermeasures. npj Clean Water, 5, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-022-00183-0 28. Hosseinipour, E., Harris, E., El Nazer, H. A., Mohamed, Y. M. A., & Davies, P. A. (2023). Desalination by batch reverse osmosis (RO) of brackish groundwater containing sparingly soluble salts. Desalination, 566, Article 116875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116875 29. Hydranautics. (2019). Membrane start-up, shutdown, and preservative flushing guidelines (Technical Service Bulletin TSB118.16). Nitto Group. https://membranes.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/TSB/TSB118.pdf 30. Khaydarov, R. A., & Khaydarov, R. R. (2007). Solar powered direct osmosis desalination. Desalination, 217(1-3), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.03.004 31. Kim, G., Song, Y., Hwang, T.-M., Park, Y.-G., Davies, P. A., & Park, K. (2025). Practical implementation and challenges of current batch-type RO systems and future potential: A review. Desalination, 616, Article 119404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119404 32. Kim, H.-W., Choi, W., Suh, D., Baek, Y., Cho, K., & Jeong, S. (2023). Pilot study of biofouling occurrence in a brackish water reverse osmosis system using intermittent operation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 139097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139097 33. Lautenschlager, K., Boon, N., Wang, Y., Egli, T., & Hammes, F. (2010). Overnight stagnation of drinking water in household taps induces microbial growth and changes in community composition. Water Research, 44(17), 4868-4877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.032 34. Lee, S., Cho, H., Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2023). Application of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to analyze membrane fouling under intermittent operation. Membranes, 13(4), Article 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040392 35. Lee, T., Choi, J. Y., & Cohen, Y. (2019). Gypsum scaling propensity in semi-batch RO (SBRO) and steady-state RO with partial recycle (SSRO-PR). Journal of Membrane Science, 588, Article 117106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.030 36. Li, M. (2026). Do membrane transport properties vary under dynamic and cyclic RO? Evidence for constant permeability and hysteresis from channel history. Desalination, 620, Article 119644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119644 37. Liang, Y. Y., & Li, M. (2026). Unsteady-state dynamics and AI in membrane desalination: Challenges and emerging opportunities. Desalination, 618, Article 119507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119507 38. Ling, F., Whitaker, R., LeChevallier, M. W., & Liu, W. T. (2018). Drinking water microbiome assembly induced by water stagnation. The ISME Journal, 12(6), 1520-1531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0101-5 39. Lu, X., Kujundzic, E., Mizrahi, G., Wang, J., Cobry, K., Peterson, M., Gilron, J., & Greenberg, A. R. (2012). Ultrasonic sensor control of flow reversal in RO desalination-Part 1: Mitigation of calcium sulfate scaling. Journal of Membrane Science, 419-420, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.027 40. Ma, M., Huang, B., Mei, L., Huang, K., Xing, K., & Liao, L. (2026). Development of a zero-stagnant-water purification system based on smart series-parallel control of dual RO membranes. Membranes, 16(5), Article 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16050155 41. Majamaa, K., Bertheas, U., Finlayson, F., & Levy, R. B. (2011). Preservation of reverse osmosis membranes with non oxidizing biocides - comparison with SMBS. Water Supply, 11(3), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2011.041 42. Ogunniyi, E. O., & Richards, B. S. (2026). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Resilient operating windows of a photovoltaic-powered desalination system operating under transient solar conditions. Desalination, 625, Article 119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2026.119942 43. Park, G. L., Schäfer, A. I., & Richards, B. S. (2011). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: The effect of wind speed fluctuations on the performance of a wind-powered membrane system for brackish water desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 370(1-2), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.003 44. Park, G. L., Schäfer, A. I., & Richards, B. S. (2012). The effect of intermittent operation on a wind-powered membrane system for brackish water desalination. Water Science and Technology, 65(5), 867-874. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.912 45. Patel, C. G., Joshi, M., & Swaminathan, J. (2024). Membrane compaction in batch reverse osmosis operation and its impact on specific energy consumption. Desalination, 592, 118132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118132 46. Philibert, M., Villacorte, L. O., Ekowati, Y., Abushaban, A., & Salinas-Rodriguez, S. G. (2024). Fouling and scaling in reverse osmosis desalination plants: A critical review of membrane autopsies, feedwater quality guidelines and assessment methods. Desalination, 592(C), Article 118188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118188 47. Pomerantz, N., Ladizhansky, Y., Korin, E., Waisman, M., Daltrophe, N., & Gilron, J. (2006). Prevention of scaling of reverse osmosis membranes by "zeroing" the elapsed nucleation time. Part I. Calcium sulfate. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(6), 2008-2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie051040k 48. Ren, A., Dai, Z., Li, X., van der Meer, W., Rose, J. B., & Liu, G. (2025). Temperature-dependent microbial dynamics in touchless sensor faucets during short-term stagnation. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 28, Article 100624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2025.100624 49. Richards, B. S., Capão, D. P. S., Früh, W. G., & Schäfer, A. I. (2015). Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Impact of solar irradiance fluctuations on performance of a brackish water reverse osmosis system. Separation and Purification Technology, 156, 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.025 50. Richards, B. S., Capão, D. P. S., & Schäfer, A. I. (2008). Renewable energy powered membrane technology. 2. The effect of energy fluctuations on performance of a photovoltaic hybrid membrane system. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(12), 4563-4569. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703157n 51. Ruiz-García, A., & Nuez, I. (2020). Long-term intermittent operation of a full-scale BWRO desalination plant. Desalination, 489, Article 114526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114526 52. Sarker, N. R., & Bilton, A. M. (2021). Real-time computational imaging of reverse osmosis membrane scaling under intermittent operation. Journal of Membrane Science, 636, Article 119556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119556 53. Sarker, N. R., Cherukupally, P., Sodhi, R., & Bilton, A. M. (2025). End-of-the-day rinsing for improved maintainability of intermittently operated small-scale photovoltaic-powered reverse osmosis systems. Desalination, 599, 118439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118439 54. Schäfer, A. I., Shen, J., & Richards, B. S. (2018). Renewable energy-powered membrane technology in Tanzanian communities. npj Clean Water, 1(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-018-0026-6 55. Sitterley, K. A., Binger, Z., & Jenne, D. S. (2025). Comparing constant and transient membrane transport parameters for use in wave desalination models. Membranes, 15(8), Article 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15080243 56. Sitterley, K. A., Cath, T. J., Jenne, D. S., Yu, Y.-H., & Cath, T. Y. (2022). Performance of reverse osmosis membrane with large feed pressure fluctuations from a wave-driven desalination system. Desalination, 527, Article 115546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.115546 57. Torii, S., Hashimoto, T., Do, A. T., Furumai, H., & Katayama, H. (2019). Impact of repeated pressurization on virus removal by reverse osmosis membranes for household water treatment. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 5(5), 910-919. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EW00944A 58. Tow, E. W., Wei, Q. J., Abraham, A. R., Chua, K. L., Plumley, M. J., & Lienhard, J. H. (2025). Piloting batch reverse osmosis with a flexible bladder for water recovery from scaling-prone brine. npj Clean Water, 8, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-025-00462-6 59. Tu, K. L., Chivas, A. R., & Nghiem, L. D. (2014). Effects of chemical preservation on flux and solute rejection by reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 472, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.052 60. Uchymiak, M., Bartman, A. R., Daltrophe, N., Weissman, M., Gilron, J., Christofides, P. D., Kaiser, W. J., & Cohen, Y. (2009). Brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO) operation in feed flow reversal mode using an ex situ scale observation detector (EXSOD). Journal of Membrane Science, 341(1-2), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.039 61. Valladares Linares, R., Wexler, A. D., Bucs, S. S., Dreszer, C., Zwijnenburg, A., Flemming, H. C., Kruithof, J. C., & Vrouwenvelder, J. S. (2016). Compaction and relaxation of biofilms. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(28), 12902-12914. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1057036 62. Van Buggenhout, S., Verbeke, R., Davenport, D. M., & Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2025). Drying polymer membranes for preservation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 731, Article 124190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124190 63. Warsinger, D. M., Tow, E. W., Maswadeh, L. A., Connors, G. B., Swaminathan, J., & Lienhard, J. H. (2018). Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis. Water Research, 137, 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.060 64. Wu, J., He, J., Quezada-Renteria, J. A., Le, J., Au, K., Guo, K., Xiao, M., Wang, X., Dlamini, D., Fan, H., Pataroque, K., Suleiman, Y., Shahbazmohamadi, S., Elimelech, M., Li, Y., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2024). Polyamide reverse osmosis membrane compaction and relaxation: Mechanisms and implications for desalination performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 706, Article 122893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122893 65. Wu, J., He, J., Quezada-Renteria, J. A., Xiao, M., Le, J., Au, K., Guo, K., Ye, N., Toma, T., Elimelech, M., Li, Y., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2025). Role of transmembrane pressure and water flux in reverse osmosis composite membrane compaction and performance. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(17), 8856-8866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c02618 66. Yang, H., Choi, J., Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2022). Effect of intermittent operation modes on performance of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in desalination and water treatment. Membrane and Water Treatment, 13(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2022.13.1.039 67. Yin, Y., & Huang, H. (2026). Membrane-based decentralized water supply systems for rural population: A critical review. Journal of Environmental Management, 405, Article 129727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129727 68. Zhang, B., Jiang, Y., Fang, F., & Zhang, K. (2019). Membrane fouling in reverse-osmosis filters during real drinking water purification: Impact of operation modes and pretreatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 159, 214-223. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24058 69. Zlatanović, L., van der Hoek, J. P., & Vreeburg, J. H. G. (2017). An experimental study on the influence of water stagnation and temperature change on water quality in a full-scale domestic drinking water system. Water Research, 123, 761-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.019