logo
calendar22 Mart 2025
view30
Main language:Uzbek

QULUPNAY NAVLARINING KASALLIKLARGA NISBATAN TA’SIRCHANLIGI

Field of Science:
pdf

67de85d4e18a1.pdf

PDF

Agrochemistry, Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine

Agrochemistry, Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
It was found that the disease susceptibility of strawberry varieties depends on their genetic characteristics, agrotechnical measures and external environmental conditions. The variety “Santa” is sensitive to Botrytis (gray mold) and Verticillium diseases, and 0.3% and 2.0% damage was observed in 2017-2018, respectively. The “Seolhyang” variety was fully resistant to Botrytis. The effectiveness of agrotechnical measures has been proven, and the rate of Verticilliosis in the “Maehyang” variety decreased from 1.7% in 2018-2019 to 0.5% in 2019-2020. The results confirm that effective care methods and optimal agrotechnical approaches play an important role in reducing the spread of diseases.

AUTHORS

O.Sindarov

“Toshkent irrigatsiya va qishloq xo‘jaligini mexanizatsiyalash muhandislari instituti” Milliy tadqiqot universiteti

Tags

# diseases# суспензия# suspension# болезни# kasalliklar# qulupnay# osma# Seolhyang”# “Maehyang”# “Jukhyang”# “Keumsil”# “Santa”# #“Arihyang”.# клубника# «Seolhyang»# «Maehyang»# «Jukhyang»# «Keumsil»# «Santa»# # «Arihyang».# strawberry# # “Arihyang”.

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0071/A0325-0002

DOI:

Not Available

References

1. Hancock, J.F. and Luby, J.J. (1995) Adaptive zones and ancestry of the most important can strawberry cultivars. Fruit Varieties Journal 49, 85–89

2. Hancock, J.F., Scott, D.H. and Lawrence, F.J. (1996) Strawberries. In: Janick and J.N. Moore (eds) Fruit Breeding, Vol. II. Vine and Small Fruits. John Wiley & Sons. New York, pp. 419–470.

3. Hancock, J.F. and Luby, J.J. (1993) Genetic resources at our doorstep: the wild strawberries. Bioscience 43, pp. 141–147.

4. Hancock, J.F. and Bringhurst, R.S. (1988) Yield component interactions in wild populations of California Fragaria. HortScience 23, pp. 889–890.

5. Hancock, J.F., Callow, P.W., Serçe, S. and Son, P.Q. (2003) Variation in the horticultural characteristics of native Fragaria virginiana and F. chiloensis from North and South America. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128, pp. 201–208

6. Husaini, A.M. (2010) Pre- and post-agroinfection strategies for efficient leaf disk transformation and regeneration of transgenic strawberry plants. Plant Cell Reports 29, pp. 97–110.

7. Korbin, M. (2011) Molecular approaches to disease resistance in Fragaria spp. Journal of Plant Protection Research 51, pp. 60–65

8. Koskela, E.A., Mouhu, K., Albani, M.C., Kurokura, T., Rantanen, M., Sargent, D.J., Battey, N.H., Coupland, G., Elomaa, P. and Hytönen, T. (2012) Mutation in TERMINAL FLOWER1 reverses the photoperiodic requirement for flowering in the wild strawberry Fragaria vesca. Plant Physiology 159, pp. 1043–1054.

9. http://strawberryplants.org