logo
calendar22 Mart 2025
view22
Main language:Uzbek

SUV TANQISLIGI VA OPTIMAL SUG‘ORISH SHAROITIDAGI OTA-ONA SHAKLLARI VA F2 DURAGAYLARIDA XLOROFILL MIQDORINI ANIQLASH

Field of Science:
pdf

67e14dc17b183.pdf

PDF

Agrochemistry, Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine

Agrochemistry, Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This article presents data on experiments conducted to determine the amount of chlorophyll in parental forms and F2 hybrids under water deficit and optimal irrigation conditions and their analysis. In the experiment, the amount of chlorophyll in the leaves of cotton plants under water deficit conditions and in an environment with an optimal irrigation regime was compared, and the hybrid combinations F2C-6580 xAcala-40 and F2Sulton x Hapicala-19, which have a high chlorophyll index against a background of water deficit, were selected.

AUTHORS

N.Mavlonova

Toshkent davlat agrar universiteti

G.Matyakubova

Samarqandat davlat veterinariya meditsinasi, chorvachilik va biotexnologiyalar universiteti

B.Madartov

Toshkent davlat agrar universiteti

Tags

# variety# cotton# nav# сорт# образец# sample# хлопчатник# гибрид# hybrid# дефицит воды# хлорофилл# g’o’za# duragay# chlorophyll# namuna# suv tanqisligi# G.hirsutum L.# xlorofill# optimal sug’orish# G. hirsutum L.# оптимальное оро- шение# water deficit# optimal irrigation

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0071/A0325-0058

DOI:

Not Available

References

1. Cramer, W.A., Zhang, H., Yan, J., Kurisu, G. and Smith, J. L. (2004) Evolution of photosynthesis, Time-independent structure of the cytochrome b f complex. Biochemistry 43, 5921-5929.

2. Odilov Z.S., Nabiyev S., Kaxxorov I. G‘o‘za usimligida irsiy va mavsumiy o’zgaruvchanlik - populyatsion gomeastazni tashkil etuvchi omillardir // Biologiya 2010 3 64-68 b.

3. Stiller, W.N., Read, J.J., Constable, G.A., Reid, P.E., 2005 Selection for water use efficiency traits in a cotton breeding program: cultivar differences. Crop Sci. 45, 1107–1113

4. Loka DM, Derrick M, Oosterhuis, Ritchie GL. Water-deficit stress in cotton. In: Oosterhuis DM, eds. Stress physiology in cotton. Number Seven The Cotton Foundation Book Series. 2011 p. 37-725.

5. Ackerson R.C. 1981 Osmoregulation in cotton in response to water stress. II. Leaf carbohydrate status in relation to osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiol. 67: 476-480

6. Berlin, J., J.E. Quisenberry, F. Bailey, M. Woodworth, and B.L. McMichael. 1982 Effect of water stress on cotton leaves : I. an electron microscopic stereological study of the palisade cells. Plant Physiol. 70:238-243.

7. Pettigrew W.T., Heitholt J..J, Vaughn K.C. 1993 Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaftype isolines. // Crop Sci 33: p. 1295–1299.

8. Nepomuceno, A. L., D.M. Oosterhuis, and J.M. Stewart. 1998 Physiological responses of cotton leaves and roots to water deficit induced by polyethylene glycol. Environ. Exp. Bot. 40: 29-41.

9. Ting-ting Xie, Pei-xi Su, Li-zhe An, Li-shan Shan, Zi-juan Zhou & Zhong-ping Chai Physiological characteristics of high yield under cluster planting: photosynthesis and canopy microclimate of cotton Plant Production Science, 2016 Vol. 19, no. 1, 165–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2015.1128088