logo
calendar20 Avgust 2025
view38
Main language:Russian

HYBRID BIOGAS PLANTS: ECONOMIC VIABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS

Field of Science:
pdf

68a56975e58e1.pdf

PDF

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
Abstract. This study provides a comprehensive economic and environmental assessment of a hybrid biogas plant integrating a biogas reactor with solar technologies. An analysis of capital and operational costs was conducted, the payback period was calculated, and environmental impacts, including CO₂ emissions reduction, were determined. A comparison of energy production and cost with traditional sources revealed the advantages of the proposed technology. Methods and Materials. To evaluate the economic efficiency of the hybrid biogas plant (HBP), calculations were performed, including the determination of the levelized cost of energy (LCOE), initial investment, and operational expenses analysis. Reliability and accessibility criteria for energy supply were also examined. Additionally, government support measures such as subsidies and incentives in the renewable energy sector were considered. Results. The integration of solar panels and thermal collectors accelerates the payback period of the HBP compared to standalone biogas plants by increasing energy production and reducing operational expenses. For a small-scale system with capital investments of approximately $600, the annual energy generation is around 1000 kWh, resulting in energy cost savings of about $100 per year, corresponding to a payback period of approximately six years. Environmental analysis has shown that producing 100 m³ of biogas annually can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1700 kg CO₂-equivalent. This is achieved through methane capture and the substitution of fossil fuels. Additionally, controlled waste processing reduces soil and water pollution, decreases atmospheric pollutant emissions, and enhances the energy independence of farms and remote areas. Conclusion. The study confirmed the economic feasibility of implementing hybrid biogas systems and their significant environmental benefits. The integration of solar technologies contributes to lower operational costs and reduced carbon footprint. Due to their scalability and adaptability to various climatic conditions, such installations represent a promising direction in sustainable energy development. Future research could focus on optimizing system configurations, reducing capital costs, and developing effective government support mechanisms to enhance the investment attractiveness of this technology

AUTHORS

N.Avezova

FPI

N.Matchanov

O‘zbekenergotamir

A.Usmanov

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fanlar akademiyasi Fizika-texnika instituti

Tags

# устойчивое развитие# payback period# биогаз# biogas# barqaror rivojlanish# возобновляемые источники энергии# renewable energy sources# sustainable development# iqtisodiy samaradorlik# biogaz# qayta tiklanuvchi energiya manba# energiya mustaqilligi# гибридные биогазовые установки# экономическая целесообразность# капитальные затраты# эксплуатационные затраты# срок окупаемости# снижение выбросов парниковых газ# энергонезависимость# сокращение загрязнения почвы и в# экологические преимущества# hybrid biogas plants# economic viability# capital expenses# operational expenses# reduction of greenhouse gas emis# energy independence# reduction of soil and water poll# environmental benefits# gibrid biogaz qurilmalari# kapital xarajatlari# ekspluatatsion xarajatlar# qoplanish muddati# parnik gazlari chiqindilarini ka# tuproq va suv ifloslanishini kam# ekologik ustunliklar

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

References

Mayank Kori, Sohail Bux. Economic Analysis of a Hybrid Solar Biogas Refrigeration System for Dairy Applications. Nanotechnology Perceptions 20, no.7, 2024. 1650-1659.

A.K. Podder, S.A. Supti, S. Islam, M. Malvoni, A. Jayakumar, S. Deb, N.M. Kumar. Feasibility Assessment of Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic-Biogas Generator Based Charging Station: A Case of Easy Bike and Auto Rickshaw Scenario in a Developing Nation. Sustainability, 2022, 14(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010166

C. Roldán-Porta, C. Roldán-Blay, D. Dasí-Crespo, G. Escrivá-Escrivá. Optimising a Biogas and Photovoltaic Hybrid System for Sustainable Power Supply in Rural Areas. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042155

Svensson, M., Nilsson, P., & Andersson, K. (2019). Energy and mass balance of hybrid biogas-solar energy systems. Renewable Energy, 141, 234–242.

IRENA (2020). Renewable energy policies in a time of transition. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Renewable-energy-policiesin-a-time-of-transition.

Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Al Seadi, T., & Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. (2009). The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5478–5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046

IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/.

https://solarmir.uz/?page_id=55

Mohammed Khaleel Jameel, Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa, Hassan Safi Ahmed, Amira jassim Mohammed, Hameed Ghazy, Maha Noori Shakir, Amran Mezher Lawas, Saad khudhur Mohammed, Ameer Hassan Idan, Zaid H. Mahmoud, Hamidreza Sayadi, Ehsan Kianfar. Biogas: Production, properties, applications, economic and challenges: A review. Results in Chemistry, Vol.7, 2024, 101549

Marco Scholz, Bernard Frank, Felix Stockmeier, Sebastian Falss, Matthias Wessling. Technoeconomic Analysis of Hybrid Processes for Biogas Upgrading. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(47):16929-16938. DOI: 10.1021/ie402660s

Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017). The circular economy in detail. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/explore/the-circular-economy-in-detail

А.Г. Бугаков, Н.Р. Авезова, А.М. Мирзабаев, А.У. Вохидов, А.Ю. Усманов. Солнечнобиогазовая система энергообеспечения биореактора. Патент на полезную модель № FAP 01315 (UZ). Официальный бюллетень Агентства по интеллектуальной собственности РУз. № 8. 2018.

Н.Р. Авезова, О.З. Тоиров, А.Ю. Усманов. Гибридные биогазовые установки: технологии и перспективы // Проблемы информатики и энергетики, 2024, №5., стр.76- 92.

Н.Р. Авезова, А.Ю. Усманов, М.А. Куралов. Планирование системы теплоснабжения объектов животноводства и обеспечению необходимого микроклимата в них. Проблемы энерго- и ресурсосбережения 2022, №3, стр. 101-109

Н.Р. Авезова, А.Ю. Усманов, М.А. Куралов. Конструктивно-технологические и энергетические параметры биогазовой установки для обеспечения системы теплоснабжения и вентиляции на примере объекта коровника // Проблемы энерго- и ресурсосбережения, 2024, №4, стр. 124-131

N. R. Avezova, E.Yu. Rakhimov, A.E. Khaitmukhamedov, B.B. Boliev, A.Yu. Usmonov. Dependence of Techno-Economic and Ecological Indicators of Flat-Plate Solar Water Heating Collectors in Hot Water Supply Systems from the Temperature of Heating Water // Applied Solar Energy, 2018. Vol. 54, No. 4. pp. 297-301.

The Open Ukrainian Citation Index (OUCI; http://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en)

Kumar, A., & Sah, B. Economic analysis of small-scale biogas plants integrated with solar energy in rural areas. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2020.58, 123–132.

Hannah Ritchie, Pablo Rosado and Max Roser (2020) - “Breakdown of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions by sector” Published online at OurWorldinData.org. Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector

What is the environmental impact of 1m3 of natural gas used for

Francesco Calise, Francesco Liberato Cappiello, Luca Cimmino, Massimo Dentice d’Accadia, Maria Vicidomini. Integration of photovoltaic panels and solar collectors into a plant producing biomethane for the transport sector: Dynamic simulation and case study. Heliyon. Vol. 9, Iss. 4e 14681 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14681