logo
calendar23 Avgust 2025
view35
Main language:Russian

UV-RESISTANT NEXT-GENERATION POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES FOR SOLAR ENERGY APPLICATIONS

Field of Science:
pdf

68a9363d0d97e.pdf

PDF

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
Abstract: This paper presents the development of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) aimed at improving the ultraviolet (UV) radiation resistance of polymer materials used in solar energy systems, along with an investigation of their properties. It is shown that the use of nanofillers such as TiO₂, ZnO, graphene, and MWCNTs significantly enhances the mechanical strength and thermal stability of polymer components. Surface modification of nanofillers improves their compatibility with the polymer matrix and their effectiveness in mitigating UV degradation, highlighting the relevance of the conducted research. Materials and Methods: The study focused on the development of UV-resistant polymer nanocomposites and the evaluation of their applicability in solar energy systems. Nanofillers including TiO₂, ZnO, graphene, oxidized graphene (GO/rGO), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), CeO₂, P-CNC, and NaYF₄:Eu³⁺ were incorporated into the composites. These nanomaterials were synthesized within various polymer matrices such as epoxy, polyurethane, PVAc, and PVA. Results: The results demonstrated that polymer nanocomposites containing TiO₂, ZnO, graphene, and MWCNTs exhibited improved resistance to UV radiation, reduced photodegradation, and enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Surface modification of nanofillers led to better dispersion and stronger interaction with the polymer matrix. Hybrid nanocomposites provided broad-spectrum UV protection and high durability, making them promising materials for solar energy applications. Conclusion: Polymer nanocomposites based on UV-resistant nanofillers improve the durability and efficiency of solar panels. Surface modification enhances their compatibility with the polymer matrix. However, issues such as nanoparticle agglomeration, photocatalytic activity, and environmental risks remain. Future research involving hybrid nanomaterials and advanced modeling techniques could effectively address these challenges.

AUTHORS

A.Komilov

Qayta tiklanuvchi energiya manbalari milliy ilmiy-tadqiqot instituti

E.Jorayev

Qayta tiklanuvchi energiya manbalari milliy ilmiy-tadqiqot instituti

I.Tuychiyev

O'zFA FTI

Tags

# нанонаполнитель# nanofiller# ультрафиолетовое (УФ) излучение# полимерные нанокомпозиты (ПНК)# диоксид титана (TiO₂)# Ultrabinafsha (УФ-излучение)# Polimer nanokompozitlar (ПНК)# Nanoto‘ldiruvchi# Titandioksid (TiO₂)# ultraviolet (UV) radiation# polymer nanocomposites (PNCs)# titanium dioxide (TiO₂)

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0032/A0825-0001

DOI:

Not Available

References

1. Pawar T.J., Contreras López D., Olivares Romero J.L., Vallejo Montesinos J. Surface modification of titanium dioxide. J Mater Sci. 2023;58:6887–930.

2. Sazali N., Ibrahim H., Jamaludin A.S., Mohamed M.A., Salleh W.N.W., Abidin M.N.Z. Degradation and stability of polymer: A mini review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. IOP Publishing; 2020. p. 12048.

3. Goodwin Jr D.G., Lai T., Lyu Y., Lu C.Y., Campos A., Reipa V, et al. The impacts of moisture and ultraviolet light on the degradation of graphene oxide/polymer nanocomposites. NanoImpact. 2020;19:100249.

4. Papadopoulos A., Gkikas G., Paipetis A.S., Barkoula N-M. Effect of CNTs addition on the erosive wear response of epoxy resin and carbon fibre composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;84:299–307.

5. Martínez G., Merinero M., Pérez-Aranda M., Pérez-Soriano EM, Ortiz T., Villamor E., et al. Environmental impact of nanoparticles’ application as an emerging technology: A review. Materials. 2020;14:166.

6. Kiew S.F., Kiew L.V., Lee H.B., Imae T., Chung L.Y. Assessing biocompatibility of graphene oxide-based nanocarriers: A review. Journal of Controlled Release. 2016;226:217–28.

7. Parvizi P., Jalilian M., Dearn K.D. Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Nanomaterials and Fibres: Manufacturing, Properties, and Applications. Polym Test. 2025;108761.

8. Chen S., Moore A.L., Cai W., Suk J.W., An J., Mishra C., et al. Raman measurements of thermal transport in suspended monolayer graphene of variable sizes in vacuum and gaseous environments. ACS Nano. 2011;5:321–8.

9. Suk J.W., Piner R.D., An J., Ruoff R.S. Mechanical properties of monolayer graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2010;4:6557–64.

10. Kumar P., Shahzad F., Yu S., Hong S.M., Kim Y-H., Koo C.M. Large-area reduced graphene oxide thin film with excellent thermal conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness. Carbon N Y. 2015;94:494–500.

11. Xunwen S., Liqun Z., Weiping L., Huicong L., Hui Y. The synthesis of monodispersed M-CeO 2/SiO 2 nanoparticles and formation of UV absorption coatings with them. RSC Adv. 2020;10:4554–60.

12. Kumar A., Sharma K., Dixit A.R. A review on the mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and graphene. Carbon letters. 2021;31:149–65.

13. Ding R.G., Lu G.Q., Yan Z.F., Wilson M.A. Recent advances in the preparation and utilization of carbon nanotubes for hydrogen storage. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2001;1:7–29.

14. Tang Z.K., Zhang L., Wang N., Zhang X.X., Wen G.H., Li G.D. et al. Superconductivity in 4 angstrom single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science (1979). 2001;292:2462–5.

15. Baughman R.H., Zakhidov A.A., De Heer W.A. Carbon nanotubes--the route toward applications. Science (1979). 2002;297:787–92.

16. Wu Y., Huang M., Wang F., Huang X.M.H., Rosenblatt S., Huang L. et al. Determination of the Young’s modulus of structurally defined carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2008;8:4158–61.

17. Cheng Y., Li X., Gao H., Wang J., Luo G., Golberg D. et al. Diameter, strength and resistance tuning of double-walled carbon nanotubes in a transmission electron microscope. Carbon N Y. 2020;160:98–106.

18. Yu M-F, Lourie O., Dyer M.J., Moloni K., Kelly T.F., Ruoff R.S. Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science (1979). 2000;287:637–40.

19. Wu F. Cao Y., Liu H., Zhang X. High-performance UiO-66-NH2 tubular membranes by zirconia-induced synthesis for desulfurization of model gasoline via pervaporation. J Memb Sci. 2018;556:54–65.

20. Zhu R., Liang H., Bai H., Zhu T., Mei Z. Double is better: achieving an oxide solar-blind UV detector with ultrahigh detectivity and fast-refreshing capability. Appl Mater Today. 2022;29:101556.

21. Hegemann D., Brunner H., Oehr C. Plasma treatment of polymers for surface and adhesion improvement. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;208:281–6.

22. Cui Y., Kumar S., Kona B.R., van Houcke D. Gas barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2015;5:63669–90.

23. Joel E.F., Lujanienė G. Progress in graphene oxide hybrids for environmental applications. Environments. 2022;9:153.

24. Habeeb M.A., Kadhim W.K. Study the optical properties of (PVA-PVAC-Ti) nanocomposites. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2014;9:109.

25. Radilla J, Martínez H, Vázquez O., Campillo B. Atmospheric Plasma Treatment to Improve PHB Coatings on 316L Stainless Steel. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16:2073.

26. Hendren KD, Baughman TW, Deck PA, Foster EJ. In situ dispersion and polymerization of polyethylene cellulose nanocrystal‐based nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020;137:48500.

27. Iesalnieks M, Eglītis R, Juhna T, Šmits K, Šutka A. Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 coatings obtained at room temperature on a polymethyl methacrylate substrate. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12936.

28. Ren .L, Tong L., Yi X., Zhou W., Wang D., Liu L., et al. Ultrathin graphene encapsulated Cu nanoparticles: A highly stable and efficient catalyst for photocatalytic H2 evolution and degradation of isopropanol. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;390:124558.

29. Zhu J., Wei S., Li Y., Pallavkar S., Lin H., Haldolaarachchige N. et al. Comprehensive and sustainable recycling of polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:16239–46.

30. Ivanoska-Dacikj A., Bogoeva-Gaceva G., Buzarovska A. Clay improved dispersion of carbon nanotubes in different solvents. Contributions, Sec Nat Math Biotech Sci, MASA. 2015;36:5–10.

31. Mulembo T., Nagai G., Tamagawa H., Nitta T., Sasaki M. Conductive and flexible multi‐walled carbon nanotube/polydimethylsiloxane composites made with naphthalene/toluene mixture. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136:48167.

32. Azani M-R., Hassanpour A. UV-Curable Polymer Nanocomposites: Material Selection, Formulations, and Recent Advances. Journal of Composites Science. 2024;8:441.

33. Zeng Q.H., Yu A.B., Lu G.Q. Multiscale modeling and simulation of polymer nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci. 2008;33:191–269.

34. Huang L., Yi N., Wu Y., Zhang Y., Zhang Q., Huang Y., et al. Multichannel and repeatable self-healing of mechanical enhanced graphene-thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Adv Mater. 2013;25:2224–8.