logo
calendar20 Noyabr 2025
view39
Main language:Uzbek

ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE METAPHOR AND METONYMY IN UZBEK

Field of Science:
pdf

691eea9aba7d4.pdf

PDF

“Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan” - Electronic Journal and Internet portal

“Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan” - Electronic Journal and Internet portal

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This article examines how national thinking is reflected in Uzbek cognitive metaphors and metonymies through various examples. It first outlines the concept of metaphor and its types — simple, animating, synesthetic, and cognitive — emphasizing their theoretical features. The cognitive metaphor is interpreted as an essential means of understanding the world, with its formation mechanism defined through the interaction between donor and recipient domains. The main types of cognitive metaphors — structural, orientational, and ontological — are analyzed using examples from literary texts. The article provides an in-depth discussion of cognitive metaphors based on the abstraction of motion and the conceptualization of time, emphasizing the decisive role of national perception in shaping them. The term “cognitive metonymy” is introduced and explained, and its conceptual essence is clarified. It is shown that cognitive metonymy also reflects the systematic knowledge and conceptual worldview of native speakers. In cognitive metaphor, abstract and complex concepts are understood through concrete ones, facilitating the process of cognition; metaphor thus functions as an active cognitive tool, with the basis of comparison determined by national thinking. In cognitive metonymy, abstract concepts are perceived through their conceptual connections with other notions. In conclusion, both cognitive metaphor and cognitive metonymy demonstrate that concrete concepts play a crucial role in comprehending abstract notions, while the interplay between sensory and rational cognition becomes particularly evident.

AUTHORS

M.Karimovna

Alisher Navoiy nomidagi Toshkent davlat o‘zbek tili va adabiyoti universiteti

F.Rahmatova

Alisher Navoiy nomidagi Toshkent davlat o'zbek tili va adabiyoti universiteti

Tags

# метафора# metaphor# номинация# nomination# metafora# метонимия# metonymy# когнитивная метафора# cognitive metaphor# metonimiya# nominatsiya# cognitive metonymy# structural metaphor# orientational (referential) meta# ontological metaphors# national perception# kognitiv metafora# kognitiv metonimiya# struktur metafora# orientatsion (yo‘naltiruvchi) me# ontologik metaforalar# milliy idrok# когнитивная меттонимия# структурная метафора# ориентационная (референциальная)# онтологические метафоры# национальное восприятие

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0222/A1125-0012

DOI:

Not Available

References

Hakimova M. Leveling lexical abstraction in Uzbek Language. Anglisticum Journal. May, 2019. — pp. 36–42. — URL: https://www.anglisticum.org.mk/index.php/IJLLIS/article/view/1918

Khakimova M. The human factor in the formation of abstract vocabulary. // Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, — 2021. — No 11. pp.124–126.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. — Chikago and London, 242 p.

Rahmatullayev Sh. Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. Darslik. — Toshkent: Universitet, 2006. — 204 b.

Xakimova M. Semasiologiya. — Toshkent, 2025. — 150 b.

Xakimova M. Synesthetic metaphor in uzbek language // Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, January 2021. — № 10(3). — P. 495–499. — URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367940852_Synesthetic_metaph or_in_uzbek_language?_sg%5B0%5D=IjstbeENa9G

Қобулжонова Г.К. Метафоранинг системавий лингвистик талқини: Филол.фан.номз. дисс. автореф. — Тошкент, 2000. — 124 б.

Махмараимова Ш. Оламнинг миллий лисоний тасвирида теоморфик метафоранинг когнитив аспекти: Филол. фан. бўйича фалс. д-ри (PhD) ... дисс. — Қарши, 2018. — 168 б.

Махмараимова Ш. Ўзбек тили метафораларининг антропоцентрик тадқиқи. Филол. док-ри дисс. автореф. — Термиз, 2020. — 210 б.

Маҳмудов Н. Тил тилсими тадқиқи. —Тошкент: Mumtoz so‘z, 2017. — Б. 119–120.

Миртожиев M. Семасиология. — Тошкент, 2010. — 288 б.

Насруллаева Г. Антропоцентрик метафоранинг лингвомаданий, коммуникатив, прагматик аспекти: Филология фaнлaри бўйичa фaлсaфa доктори (PhD) дисс. автореф. — Қарши, 2018. — 210 б.

Никитин М.В. Основы лингвистической теории значения. — Москва, Высшая школа, 1968. — 242 б.

Ортега-и-Гассет Х. Две великие метафоры / Теория метафоры. — М: Прогресс, 1990. — С. 68–81.

Тоҳиров З. Метафора лексема семемасининг прагматик семаси// Ўзбек тили ва адабиѐти, 1983. — Б. 73–77.

Ўзбек тилининг изоҳли луғати. 3-жилд. — Тошкент: Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси, 2005. — URL: https://library.tiiame.uz/ru/resources/01HKPBDFHVB1HAX6NTE4GDT VQM

Хажиев С.К. Сўз маъносининг кўчиши билан боғлиқ лингвистик ҳодисалар: Филол. фан. номз. дисс. автореф. — Тошкент, 2007. — 16 б.

Хакимова М. Ўзбек тилида абстракт номлар семантикаси. — Тошкент, 2019. — 142 б.

Худайберганова Д.С. Ўзбек тилидаги бадиий матнларнинг антропоцентрик тадқиқи: Филол. фан. док-ри. дисс. автореф. — Тошкент, 2015. — 18 б.