logo
calendar29 Dekabr 2025
view52
Main language:Uzbek

LOVIYA (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) NAV NAMUNALARINING MEXANIZATSIYA YORDAMIDA YIG’IB OLISHGA MOSLASHUVCHANLIGI

Field of Science:
pdf

6951fdeff2743.pdf

PDF

Agrochemistry, Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine

Agrochemistry, Plant Protection and Plant Quarantine

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This study investigated the adaptability of local and foreign common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to mechanized harvesting. The results showed that main stem height ranged from 32.5 to 95.2 cm, while the height of the lowest pods above ground varied between 3.9 and 9.7 cm, significantly affecting harvesting efficiency. Grain losses were higher in local varieties (7–12%), whereas the foreign varieties Bomba THZ and Bolshoy exhibited minimal losses (4%). Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship between stem height and pod placement. These traits can be used as marker criteria in breeding programs aimed at developing varieties adapted to mechanized harvesting.

AUTHORS

B.Mamaraximov

Qishloq xo’jaligida bilim va innovatsiyalar milliy markazi

H.Dadakhodjayev

DDEITI Toshkent ITS

G.Abduvoxidov

Paxta seleksiyasi, urug‘chiligi va yetishtirish agrotexnologiyalari ilmiy-tadqiqot instituti Oqqo’rg’on Ilmiy tajriba stansiyasi

SH.Kozubayev

Paxta seleksiyasi, urug‘chiligi va yetishtirish agrotexnologiyalari ilmiy-tadqiqot instituti

Tags

# фасоль# механизация# mechanization# mexanizatsiya# loviya# poya balandligi# высота стебля# stem height# Phaseolus vulgaris L.# common bean# don yo‘qotishlari# dukkaklarning joylashuvi# потери зерна# расположение бобов# grain losses# pod placement

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0071/A1225-0073

DOI:

Not Available

References

1. Asfaw, A., Blair, M. W., & Almekinders, C. (2009). Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the East African highlands. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1154-7

2. Beebe, S., Gonzalez, A. V., & Rengifo, J. (2011). Research on variability in seed size and its role in common bean improvement. Euphytica, 180(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0360-4

3. Blair, M. W., Gonzalez, L. F., Kimani, P. M., & Butare, L. (2010). Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1305-4

4. Broughton, W. J., Hernández, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., & Vanderleyden, J. (2003). Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant and Soil, 252, 55–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146710611

5. FAO. (2023). FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat

6. Khamidov, F., Nazarov, A., & Saidov, B. (2021). Evaluation of local and foreign common bean varieties for seed productivity and adaptation. Journal of Central Asian Agriculture, 4(1), 67–75.

7. Porch, T. G., & Jahn, M. (2001). Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of common bean. Field Crops Research, 73(2–3), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00189-1

8. Singh, S. P., & Muñoz, C. G. (1999). Resistance to common bacterial blight among Phaseolus species and common bean improvement. Crop Science, 39(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900010013x

9. Xolmatov, A., Rahimov, Sh., & Karimova, D. (2019). Loviya navlarining urug‘chilik sifat ko‘rsatkichlari va agrotexnologik xususiyatlari. O‘zbekiston qishloq xo‘jaligi jurnali, 3(2), 45–49.

10. ICARDA. (2020). Annual Report on Legume Crop Improvement. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria.