171

At present, the quality of multi-color prints can be assessed both
visually and using densitometry control, i.e. quantitatively. It would be impossible to
imagine the quality of color reproduction without methods of precise color description in
standardized mathematical expressions. In practice and scientific researches two ways
of systematization and quantitative description of colors are applied. The first is the
color standards method, and the second is the measurement method, or colorimetric
method. In the color standards method, sets of colors are prepared in advance. The
colorimetric method is based on the fact that each color has three quite defined values -
the color coordinates. Color models of color description are a means of quantifying color and the differences between shades of color. There are four types of color description
models. Two models are the most commonly used in practice: additive RGB, and
subtractive SMUK. The RGB model takes red, green and blue as the primary or basic
color. In the subtractive RGB model, cyan, magenta, and yellow are chosen as the
primary colors. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate the RGB and
subtractive RGB color models. The base emissivity of both colorimetric systems were
evaluated on a spectrophotometer CM 3600d. The spectral reflectance curves of the
primary colors of the subtractive SMUK were evaluated. Color equations for both
mathematical models have been compiled using the reflection coefficients; color
envelopes have been studied using the chromaticity diagram. It has been found that
additive RGB model has greater color gamut than subtractive SMUK model, i.e. color
losses occur. Therefore, scanners and digital cameras, monitors and output devices
should be calibrated during reproduction.

  • Web Address
  • DOI
  • Date of creation in the UzSCI system05-09-2022
  • Read count171
  • Date of publication30-06-2022
  • Main LanguageIngliz
  • Pages7-13
English

At present, the quality of multi-color prints can be assessed both
visually and using densitometry control, i.e. quantitatively. It would be impossible to
imagine the quality of color reproduction without methods of precise color description in
standardized mathematical expressions. In practice and scientific researches two ways
of systematization and quantitative description of colors are applied. The first is the
color standards method, and the second is the measurement method, or colorimetric
method. In the color standards method, sets of colors are prepared in advance. The
colorimetric method is based on the fact that each color has three quite defined values -
the color coordinates. Color models of color description are a means of quantifying color and the differences between shades of color. There are four types of color description
models. Two models are the most commonly used in practice: additive RGB, and
subtractive SMUK. The RGB model takes red, green and blue as the primary or basic
color. In the subtractive RGB model, cyan, magenta, and yellow are chosen as the
primary colors. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate the RGB and
subtractive RGB color models. The base emissivity of both colorimetric systems were
evaluated on a spectrophotometer CM 3600d. The spectral reflectance curves of the
primary colors of the subtractive SMUK were evaluated. Color equations for both
mathematical models have been compiled using the reflection coefficients; color
envelopes have been studied using the chromaticity diagram. It has been found that
additive RGB model has greater color gamut than subtractive SMUK model, i.e. color
losses occur. Therefore, scanners and digital cameras, monitors and output devices
should be calibrated during reproduction.

Author name position Name of organisation
1 Kamalova S.R. teacher TashITLI
2 Abdirakhmanova D.I. teacher TashITLI
3 Baltabayeva B.Y. teacher TashITLI
4 Klimova E.D. teacher MPU
Name of reference
1 S Stefano, V Tikhonov Theory and practice of light. Publishing house “Repro center M”. 2006. 320.
2 N.V. Zhuravleva and others. “Coloring of textile materials”. 2007. 368.
3 L.N. Mironova. Flower science. “High school”. 2004. 152
4 S. Stefanov “Light and light reproduction in printing”. 2009
5 Print Promotion. Colorimetry. “Humanvision”. 2017. 56
6 S.R. Kamalova, I.A. Bulanov, A.A. Djalilov. “Color Engineering”. 2018. 116
7 H. Kipphan. Handbook of Print Mediya. “Springer”. 2014. 1238
8 Druckfarben. “Principes of color science”. 2000. 25
9 I.Ioxannes. “The art of color”. 2000. 236
10 R. Xudayberganov. “Basics of color science”. 2008. 92
11 A.V. Churkin. ”Fundamentals of light science”. 2014. 74
12 S. Harvey. ”Sensation and perception”. 2003
13 D. Hubel. “Eye, brain, vision”. 2012. 184
14 M.B. Rebezov, N.L. Naumova, A.A. Lukin, G.K. Alkhamova, M.F. Khayrullin. “Food behavior of consumers’ question catering”. 2011. 23
15 A.V. Kondratieva, A.I. Nushtaeva, M.A. Likhodumova. To the study of consumer preferences. “Modern business space: current problems and prospects: youth scientific and practical journal”. 2013. 174
16 T.A. Perevyyshin. Prospects for the use of oats in the production of worth for new types of beer. “Bulletin of the Stavropol Agro industrial Complex”. 2014. 31
17 I.V. Kiselev. Method of production of light beer. "Berlin". 2012
18 G.N. Kosminsky, E.M. Morgunova. Technology of new kind of beer. “Beer and drinks”. 2006. 36
19 R.S. Reshetova. Electromagnetic processing during beet storage and processing. “News of University Food technology”. 2011. 123
20 M.J. Herderich., P.A. Smith P.A. Analysis of grape and wine tannins: methods, applications and challenges. “Aust.J. Grape Wine Res”. 2005. 205
Waiting