Ushbu maqolada erk muxtoriyati prinsipining ikkinchi eng muhim xususiyati bo‘lgan taraflarning huquqni tanlash masalalari muhokama qilinadi. Taraflarning shartnomaviy munosabatlardan kelib chiqadigan nizolarini hal etish uchun huquqni tanlashning o‘ziga xos jihatlari ajratib ko‘rsatiladi. Taraflarning shartnomaviy munosabatlaridan kelib chiqadigan nizolarini qaysi mamlakat huquqi yoki qonunlari asosida hal etilishi va uning ahamiyati misollar yordamida izohlanadi. Ma’lumki, taraflarning kelishuv asosida huquqni tanlay olishi dunyo bo‘ylab ko‘p mamlakatlarda tan olingan va taraflar shartnomada kelishuv asosida huquqni tanlay oladilar. Ushbu maqolada taraflarning kelishuv asosida huquqni tanlash masalalari va asosiysi taraflar tomonidan shartnomada ularning tanlovi ochiq ifoda etilmagan yoki taraflar tomonidan huquq tanlanmaganida ularning munosabatlari uchun tadbiq qilinadigan huquqni tanlashdagi o‘ziga xoslik
masalalari o‘rganib chiqiladi.
This article examines the second most important feature of the principle of autonomy of will, which is the choice of the law of the parties. The article explores and discusses the issues of choice of law by the parties within the framework of their contractual relations. Disputes arising from the contractual relationship of the parties will be resolved on the basis of the law or laws of which country and its meaning will be explained with the help of examples. It is known that the right of the parties to choose the law on the basis of a contract is recognized in the countries of the European Union, the USA and countries that adhere to the Roman law system, and the parties can choose the law on the basis of a contract within a contract. This article discusses the issues of choice of law by the parties on the basis of an agreement and, mainly, issues of the specifics of the choice of law applied to their relations when their choice is not clearly expressed by the parties in the agreement or when the law is not chosen by the
parties.
Ushbu maqolada erk muxtoriyati prinsipining ikkinchi eng muhim xususiyati bo‘lgan taraflarning huquqni tanlash masalalari muhokama qilinadi. Taraflarning shartnomaviy munosabatlardan kelib chiqadigan nizolarini hal etish uchun huquqni tanlashning o‘ziga xos jihatlari ajratib ko‘rsatiladi. Taraflarning shartnomaviy munosabatlaridan kelib chiqadigan nizolarini qaysi mamlakat huquqi yoki qonunlari asosida hal etilishi va uning ahamiyati misollar yordamida izohlanadi. Ma’lumki, taraflarning kelishuv asosida huquqni tanlay olishi dunyo bo‘ylab ko‘p mamlakatlarda tan olingan va taraflar shartnomada kelishuv asosida huquqni tanlay oladilar. Ushbu maqolada taraflarning kelishuv asosida huquqni tanlash masalalari va asosiysi taraflar tomonidan shartnomada ularning tanlovi ochiq ifoda etilmagan yoki taraflar tomonidan huquq tanlanmaganida ularning munosabatlari uchun tadbiq qilinadigan huquqni tanlashdagi o‘ziga xoslik
masalalari o‘rganib chiqiladi.
В данной статье рассматривается вторая важнейшая особенность принципа автономии воли, заключающаяся в выборе права сторон. В статье исследуются и обсуждаются вопросы выбора права сторонами в рамках их договорных отношений. Споры, возникающие из договорных отношений сторон, будут разрешаться на основании закона или законов какой страны и его значение будет объяснено с помощью примеров. Известно, что право сторон выбирать право на основании договора признается в странах Европейского Союза, США и странах, придерживающихся системы римского права, а стороны могут выбирать право на основании договора в договор. В данной статье рассматриваются
вопросы выбора права сторонами на основании договора и, главным образом, вопросы специфики выбора права, применяемого к их отношениям, когда их выбор не выражен сторонами четко в договоре или когда право не выбирается сторонами.
№ | Author name | position | Name of organisation |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Xatamjonova G.Y. | tayanch doktorant | Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti Toshkent, |
№ | Name of reference |
---|---|
1 | 1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi |
2 | 2. Mills A. Party Autonomy in Private International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp.580. |
3 | 3. Keyes M. and Marshall B. Jurisdictional agreements: Exclusive, optional and asymmetrical, 11 Journal of Private International Law, 2017. |
4 | 4. Merret L. The future enforcement of asymmetric jurisdiction agreements, 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2018. |
5 | 5. Saumier G. Article 3 of the Hague Principles: A Response to Peter Mankowski, 22 Uniform Law Review, 2017. |
6 | 6. Arzandeh A. The law governing arbitration agreements in England, 2013, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 31. |
7 | 7. Peari S. and Khaendira S. Party Autonomy in the Choice of Law: Some Insights from Australia, 2021, Liverpool Law Review, 275 – 296. |
8 | 8. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik Kodeksiga Sharh, 2013. |