Ushbu maqolaning maqsadi chiqindilarni kamaytirish va atrof-muhitga salbiy ta'sirni kamaytirish nuqtai nazaridan muqobil yoqilg'ida ishlaydigan transport vositalarining maqsadga muvofiqligi va samaradorligini baholashdir. Elektr, vodorod, biodizel va boshqalar kabi muqobil yoqilg'i manbalari zararli emissiyalarni kamaytirish va toza ekotizimni yaratish uchun istiqbolli yechimlardir. Ushbu maqolada har xil turdagi transport vositalari va yoqilg'ilarni ko'rib chiqish, ulardan foydalanishning atrof-muhitga ta'siri va ushbu texnologiyalarning samaradorligi va rentabelligini tahlil qilish ko'rib chiqiladi. Muqobil yoqilg'idan foydalanishning mumkin bo'lgan ijobiy va salbiy tomonlarini tushunish asosiy fikrlarni ochib beradi va ekologik barqaror transport yechimlarini yanada rivojlantirishni rag'batlantiradi.
Ushbu maqolaning maqsadi chiqindilarni kamaytirish va atrof-muhitga salbiy ta'sirni kamaytirish nuqtai nazaridan muqobil yoqilg'ida ishlaydigan transport vositalarining maqsadga muvofiqligi va samaradorligini baholashdir. Elektr, vodorod, biodizel va boshqalar kabi muqobil yoqilg'i manbalari zararli emissiyalarni kamaytirish va toza ekotizimni yaratish uchun istiqbolli yechimlardir. Ushbu maqolada har xil turdagi transport vositalari va yoqilg'ilarni ko'rib chiqish, ulardan foydalanishning atrof-muhitga ta'siri va ushbu texnologiyalarning samaradorligi va rentabelligini tahlil qilish ko'rib chiqiladi. Muqobil yoqilg'idan foydalanishning mumkin bo'lgan ijobiy va salbiy tomonlarini tushunish asosiy fikrlarni ochib beradi va ekologik barqaror transport yechimlarini yanada rivojlantirishni rag'batlantiradi.
The purpose of this article is to assess the feasibility and efficiency of using vehicles powered by alternative fuels in terms of reducing emissions and reducing negative environmental impacts. Alternative fuel sources such as electricity, hydrogen, biodiesel and others represent promising solutions to reduce harmful emissions and create a cleaner ecosystem. An overview of various types of vehicles and fuels, the impact of their use on the environment, as well as an analysis of the effectiveness and profitability of these technologies will be discussed in this article. Understanding the potential pros and cons of using alternative fuels will help identify key points and encourage further development of environmentally sustainable transport solutions
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qazbekov S. . | tadqiqotchi | !! |
| 2 | Mambetullaeva S. . | professor | !! |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Hackney, J., & De Neufville, R.(2001). Life cycle model of alternative fuel vehicles: emissions, energy, and cost trade-offs.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,35(3), 243-266.2.Leiby, P., & Rubin, J. (2001). Effectiveness and efficiency of policies to promote alternative fuel vehicles.Transportation Research Record,1750(1),84-91.3.Lutsey, N. (2010). Cost-effectiveness assessment of low-carbon vehicle and fuel technologies.Transportation research record,2191(1), 90-99.4.Sagar, A. D. (1995). Automobiles and global warming: Alternative fuels and other options for carbon dioxide emissions reduction.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,15(3), 241-274.5.Xu, Y., Gbologah, F. E., Lee, D. Y., Liu, H., Rodgers, M. O., & Guensler, R. L. (2015). Assessment of alternative fuel and powertrain transit bus options using real-world operations data: Life-cycle fuel and emissions modeling.Applied energy,154, 143-159. |