265

в статье рассматриваются сущность и назначение института проверки законности, обоснованности и справедливости судебных решений в уголовном процессе. Автор раскрывает назначение указанного института посредством анализа задач уголовно-процессуального законодательства. При этом предлагается определять приоритетность целей и задач уголовного судопроизводства в зависимости от стадий уголовного судопроизводства.

  • Internet havola
  • DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-9130-2019-2-9
  • UzSCI tizimida yaratilgan sana 09-12-2019
  • O'qishlar soni 0
  • Nashr sanasi 30-03-2019
  • Asosiy tilRus
  • Sahifalar70-78
Русский

в статье рассматриваются сущность и назначение института проверки законности, обоснованности и справедливости судебных решений в уголовном процессе. Автор раскрывает назначение указанного института посредством анализа задач уголовно-процессуального законодательства. При этом предлагается определять приоритетность целей и задач уголовного судопроизводства в зависимости от стадий уголовного судопроизводства.

Ўзбек

мақолада жиноят процессида суд қарорларининг қонунийлиги, асослилиги ва адолатлилигини текшириш институтини моҳият ва вазифалари кўриб чиқилган. Муаллиф томонидан кўрсатилган институт вазифалари жиноят-процессуал қонунчилиги вазифаларини таҳлил қилиш орқали ёритилган. Бунда муаллиф томонидан жиноят иш юиртишни мақсад ва вазифаларини устуворлигини жиноят процесс босқичларига боғлиқ қўриб чиқиш таклиф қилинмоқда.

English

the article discusses the essence and purpose of the institute of verification of legitimacy, validity, and fairness of decrees in the criminal process. The author reveals the purpose of the that institute by analyzing the tasks of the criminal procedure legislation. It is proposed to prioritize the goals and objectives of criminal proceedings, depending on the stages of criminal proceedings.

№ Muallifning F.I.Sh. Lavozimi Tashkilot nomi
1 Tukhtasheva U.A. Жиноят-протсессуал ҳуқуқи ва криминалистика кафедраси мудири Тошкент давлат юридик университети
№ Havola nomi
1 1. Smirnov A.V. A special procedure for the adoption of a judicial decision when concluding a pre-trial agreement on cooperation // Criminal procedure. - 2009.- № 9. - С.6-7.
2 2. Lupinskaya P.A. Decisions in criminal proceedings: theory, legislation and practice. - M .: Yurist, 2006. - P.61.
3 3. Korepanova T.L. Procedural deadlines as a guarantee of the protection of constitutional rights and individual freedoms in the Russian criminal process: author. dis. ... Cand. legal sciences. - Izhevsk, 2014. - p. 12
4 4. Mizulina E.B. On the model of the criminal process // Jurisprudence. - 1989. - № 5. - p. 51-52
5 5. Moskalkova T.N. The moral foundations of the criminal process (preliminary investigation stage): author. dis. ... Dr. Juridical Sciences. - Moscow, 1997. - p. 16
6 6. Azarov V.A. Reform of the domestic criminal justice: evaluation of individual results / Reforms in Russia: history and modernity: materials of the international scientific Internet conference / resp. ed. Mn Kleimenov. - Omsk, 2004. - p 64
7 7. Kornukov V.M. Purpose of criminal justice and its reflection in the regulation of individual stages and institutions // Conceptual foundations of the reform of criminal justice in Russia: proceedings of a scientific conference / resp. ed. I.B.Mikhaylovskaya. - M .: Prospect, 2002. - p. 56 .; Solovyov A.B. The approach to the principles of criminal justice in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation requires clarification // Conceptual foundations of the reform of criminal justice in Russia: proceedings of a scientific conference / resp. ed. I.B.Mikhaylovskaya. - M .: Prospect, 2002. - p. 87; Baranov A.M. , Derishev Yu.F., Nikolaev Yu.A. The concept and purpose of criminal proceedings. Sources of criminal procedural law: a textbook. - Omsk: Law Institute, 2003. - p. 23
8 8. Bavsun M.V. Expediency in criminal law: dis. ... Ph.D. - Omsk, 2002. - p. 16
9 9. Stoyko N.G. The new criminal procedure law of Russia and the draft Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation // Russian bulletin on human rights. - M., 2000. - Issue 13. - p. 85
10 10. http://online.zakon.kz/m
11 11. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan (approved by the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan of July 14, 2000 No. 907-IQ) (with amendments and additions as of 01/05/2018) // http://online.zakon.kz/m
12 12. Criminal Procedure Code of Turkmenistan of April 18, 2009 (as amended by the Laws of Turkmenistan of 31.03.2012 No. 292-IV, 22.12.2012 No. 359-IV, 01.03.2014 No. 41-V, 03.05. 2014 No. 78-V, 01/12/2016, No. 322-V, 03/26/2016, No. 380-V, 08.26.2017, No. 603-V, 09.06.2018) // http: // www.turkmenbusiness.org/node/124
13 13.Dikarev I.S. Problems of the theory and practice of production in the court of the supervisory authority in criminal cases. - M., 2011. - P.55
14 14. Volkolup OV The system of criminal justice and the problems of its improvement. - SPb .: Legal Center Press, 2003. - p. 180
15 15.Zhilin G.A. Tasks and objectives of the court in the appeal and cassation proceedings // Arbitration and civil process. - 2005. - № 5. - p. 27
16 16. Filin D.V. Problems of appeal in modern criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine // J. State and Law. - 2005. - № 2. - p. 77
17 17. Bryntsev V.D. Judicial power (justice): ways of reforming in Ukraine. - Kharkov, 1998.- p. 47-48
18 18.Filin D.V. Decree. slave - p. 77
19 19. Sattarova M. Appeal neem? // Uzbekistan. - 2005. - 8 November. - B.3
20 20. Smirnov A.V., Kalinovsky K.B. Criminal Procedure: A Textbook for high schools / 2-ed. Under total ed. A.V. Smirnova. - SPb .: Peter. - 2005. - p. 589
21 21. Commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation / Edited by N. A. Petukhov and G. I. Zagorsky - M., 2002. - p. 270
Kutilmoqda