This paper discusses the role of age in Second Language Acquisition and presents
the different results of relevant researches on this topic. It also compares the results and conclusions
of researches conducted by 20 scholars, linguistics and researchers. Furthermore, it explains why
and when this issue began to draw attention of linguistics along with interpretating the Critical
Period Hypothesis by Lenneberg ( 1967). It further aims to examine whether young L2 learners are
better than adult L2 learners. Taking all research together, it concludes that even though adult
second language learners may achieve particular succes in SLA especially in terms of grammar, the
early age in SLA is supported considering the fact that young learners will eventually surpass adult
second language learners in final stage of acquisition.
This paper discusses the role of age in Second Language Acquisition and presents
the different results of relevant researches on this topic. It also compares the results and conclusions
of researches conducted by 20 scholars, linguistics and researchers. Furthermore, it explains why
and when this issue began to draw attention of linguistics along with interpretating the Critical
Period Hypothesis by Lenneberg ( 1967). It further aims to examine whether young L2 learners are
better than adult L2 learners. Taking all research together, it concludes that even though adult
second language learners may achieve particular succes in SLA especially in terms of grammar, the
early age in SLA is supported considering the fact that young learners will eventually surpass adult
second language learners in final stage of acquisition.
Эта статья обсуждает роль возраста в освоении второго языка и
представляет различные результаты соответствующих исследований по этой теме. Она
также сравнивает результаты и выводы исследования, проведенные 20 учеными,
лингвистами и исследователями. Эта статья объясняет, почему и когда эта проблема
начала привлекать внимание лингвистики наряду с интерпретацией гипотезы
критического периода Леннеберга (1967). Кроме того, с целью изучения того, лучше ли
молодые ученики изучающие второй язык, чем взрослые ученики. Собрав все исследования
вместе, можно сделать вывод, что, хотя взрослые, изучающие второй язык, могут достичь
определенных успехов в усвоении второго языка, особенно в плане грамматики. Ранний
возраст в этой сфере более подходящий, учитывая тот факт, что молодые ученики в
конечном итоге превзойдут взрослых в заключительной стадии.
Bu maqola yosh omilining ikkinchi til o'rganishdagi rolini o’rganib, mazkur
mavzu bo’yicha o'tkazilgan tadqiqotlar natijasini taqdim qiladi. Shuningdek maqolada 20 ta olim,
tadqiqotchi va tilshunoslar tomonidan o'tkazilgan tadqiqotlar natijalari va xulosalari solishtiradi.
Bundan tashqari, bu mavzu nima uchun va qachondan boshlab tilshunoslar e'tiborini torta
boshlaganini va Lennebergning " Tanqidiy Davr Nazariyasi" mohiyatini tushuntirib beradi.
Shuningdek maqolada yosh ikkinchi til o'rganuvchilar yoshi katta ikkinchi til o'rganuvchilardan
ko'ra ko'proq muvaffaqiyatga erishishi yoki aksinchaligi tahlil qilinadi. Barcha tadqiqotlarni
jamlagan holda, yoshi katta ikkinchi til o'rganuvchilari Ikkinchi Til O’rganish(ITO') da ma'lum bir
muvaffaqiyatlarga, ayniqsa grammatika sohasida, erishsalar-da, ITO' ning oxirgi bosqichida yosh til
o'rganuvchilar yoshi katta o'rganuvchilarni ortda qoldirishi isbotini topgan.hisobga olgan holda
kichik yosh ma'qullanadi.
№ | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Abdukadyrova G.B. | O’zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti talabasi | |
2 | Suyunova M.I. | O’zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti talabasi |
№ | Havola nomi |
---|---|
1 | Lenneberg, E, H. (1967). Biological Foundations Of Language Learning. New York: Wiley. p.176 |
2 | Lamendella, T. (1977). General principles of neuro-functional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition. Language Learning, 27. p175 |
3 | Johnson, J & E, Newport (1989). Critical period effect in language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitivr Psuchology, 21. p 64 |
4 | Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. p.85 |
5 | Harley, B. Age in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters. 1986 p.112 |
6 | Singleton, D and L, Ryan Language Acquisition: Age factor. UK: Multilingual Matters. 2004. p.61 |
7 | Patkowski, M “ The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language”. Language learning30/2.1980 p.73/ 89.) |
8 | Thompson, E. Foreign Accents Revisited: English Pronunciation in Russian Immigrants. Language Learning, 41. 1991. ] p.24 |
9 | Weinrech, U. Language in Contact. The Hague, Netherlands, Mouton. 1953] p.35 |
10 | Johnson, L & Newport, E. Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning. The influence of Maturational State on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Pyschology.60-99.1989 p.42 |