logo
calendar7 Oktabr 2025
view24
Asosiy til:O'zbek

MAHALLIY VA XORIJIY LOVIYA (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) NAV NAMUNALARI HOSIL ELEMENTLARINING SHAKLLANISHI VA ULARNING O’ZARO KORRELYATIV BOG’LIQLIGI

Fan yo'nalishi:
pdf

68e4c81820b5b.pdf

PDF

“Agro kimyo himoya va o‘simliklar karantini” jurnali

“Agro kimyo himoya va o‘simliklar karantini” jurnali

Maqola chop etishsee more

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Ushbu maqolada mahalliy va xorijiy loviya (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) nav namunalari bo‘yicha fenologik ko‘rsatkichlar, hosil elementlari va 1000 dona don vaznining shakllanishi hamda ular o‘rtasidagi korrelyativ bog‘liqliklar o‘rganildi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatdiki, navlar o‘rtasida sezilarli tafovutlar mavjud bo‘lib, vegetatsiya muddati 81–93 kunni tashkil etdi. 1000 dona don vazni 150,1 g dan 495,7 g gacha o‘zgarib, Rovot va Mahsuldor navlari barqaror yuqori natijalar ko‘rsatdi, xorijiy navlardan Bolshoy va Bomba THZ yirik urug‘lari bilan ajralib chiqdi. Korrelatsion tahlil natijalariga ko‘ra, don hosildorligini belgilashda dukkaklar soni va urug‘ yirikligi asosiy marker-belgilar sifatida ajralib chiqdi (r = 0,71).

MUALLIFLAR

G.Abduvoxidov

PSUYAITI

B.Mamaraximov

Qishloq xo’jaligida bilim va innovatsiyalar milliy markazi

H.Dadakhodjayev

DDEITI

SH.Kozubayev

Paxta seleksiyasi, urug‘chiligi va yetishtirish agrotexnologiyalari ilmiy-tadqiqot instituti

Teglar

# фасоль# correlation# масса 1000 семян# loviya# korrelyatsion bog‘liqlik# hosil elementlari# yield components# 1000 seed weight# 1000 dona don vazni# Phaseolus vulgaris L.# dukkaklar soni# элементы урожая# количество бобов# корреляци- онная связь# common bean# number of pods

SHU JURNALDAGI BOSHQA MAQOLALAR

Maqolani baholang

0
0 ta baho
5
4
3
2
1

Maqola idintifikatorlari

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0071/A1025-0057

DOI:

Mavjud emas

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. Asfaw, A., Blair, M. W., & Almekinders, C. (2009). Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the East African highlands. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120(1), 1–12. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1154-7

2. Beebe, S., Gonzalez, A. V., & Rengifo, J. (2011). Research on variability in seed size and its role in common bean improvement. Euphytica, 180(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0360-4

3. Blair, M. W., Gonzalez, L. F., Kimani, P. M., & Butare, L. (2010). Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1305-4

4. Broughton, W. J., Hernández, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., & Vanderleyden, J. (2003). Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant and Soil, 252, 55–128. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1024146710611

5. FAO. (2023). FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www. fao.org/faostat

6. Khamidov, F., Nazarov, A., & Saidov, B. (2021). Evaluation of local and foreign common bean varieties for seed productivity and adaptation. Journal of Central Asian Agriculture, 4(1), 67–75.

7. Porch, T. G., & Jahn, M. (2001). Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of common bean. Field Crops Research, 73(2–3), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00189-1

8. Singh, S. P., & Muñoz, C. G. (1999). Resistance to common bacterial blight among Phaseolus species and common bean improvement. Crop Science, 39(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900010013x

9. Xolmatov, A., Rahimov, Sh., & Karimova, D. (2019). Loviya navlarining urug‘chilik sifat ko‘rsatkichlari va agrotexnologik xususiyatlari. O‘zbekiston qishloq xo‘jaligi jurnali, 3(2), 45–49

10. ICARDA. (2020). Annual Report on Legume Crop Improvement. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria.