HE REVISION AND MODIFICATION OF TESTS FOR LYCEUM STUDENTS IN B1 LEVEL.

1. Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing language profciency: The interface between learning and Assessment. London Press. 2. Eshboyeva D. A. Effective ways in teaching English language //Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. – 2014. – №. 8-1. – С. 312-313. 3. Шамсематова Б. Р. МЕТОД ПРОЕКТОВ НА УРОКАХ АНГЛИЙСКОГО ЯЗЫКА //Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. – 2019. – №. 2. – С. 96-99. 4. 4. Джумаева Н. Э., Сохибов А. Р. Педагогические термины и понятия //КАРШИ: Каршинский государственный университет. – 2014. – Т. 70. 5. 5. Eshboeva D. A. THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF THE LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODOLOGY // Modern Science. – 2016. – №. 6. – С. 77-79. 6. Bachman, L., & Plamer , A.S (1996). Language testing in practice. New York: Oxford University Press 7. Brown, H. D (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.) White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. 8. Brown, J. D. (1998). New ways of classroom assessment. Alexandra, VA: Teachers of Englis To Speakers of other languages. 9. Chun , C. (2005). An analysis of a language test for employment: The authenticity of the Phone Pass test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 295-308 10. Hughes A. (1981). Conversational cloze as a measure of oral ability. English Language Teaching Journal35:161-8 11. Swain, M. (1990). The language of French immersion students: Implications for theory and practice. In J.E. Alatis (Ed.) Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (pp.401-412). Washington. DC: Georgetown University Press. 12. Resolution № 272 of Cabinet of Ministry of Republic of Uzbekistan on 1996, July 31 “On the Establishment of Banking College” 13. Resolution №143 of Cabinet of Ministry № “On measures to accelerate equipping classes Foreign languages of educational institutions in the Republic with the modern information- communication equipment, technical means of teaching in 2013-2016”. May 23,2013