logo
calendar31 Iyul 2026
view13
Main language:English

MODEL-BASED ASSESSMENT OF A 60 W MONOCRYSTALLINE PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE AND TWO THREE-MODULE CONFIGURATIONS UNDER HOT-SUMMER CONDITIONS IN TERMEZ, UZBEKISTAN

Field of Science:Energy (miscellaneous)
National field of science (HAC):02.00.08 — Chemistry and technology of oil and gas04.00.12 — Construction and operation of oil and gas pipelines, bases and storage facilities04.00.13 — Development and operation of oil and gas fields05.05.04 — Industrial heat power engineering05.05.01 — Power systems and complexes05.05.02 — Electrical engineering. Electric power stations and systems. Electrotechnical complexes and devices05.05.03 — Lighting engineering. Special lighting technologies05.05.09 — Nuclear power installations and technologies05.05.10 — Nuclear reactor engineering, machines, units and materials technology of the nuclear industry05.05.05 — Theoretical foundations of thermal engineering05.05.06 — Power installations based on renewable energy sources05.05.07 — Electrical technologies and electrical equipment in agriculture
pdf

A-8_59f96d66.pdf

PDF

International Scientific Journal Science and Innovation

International Scientific Journal Science and Innovation

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This study presents a reproducible model-based assessment of a representative 60 W monocrystalline photovoltaic module and two 180 W three-module array configurations under a prescribed hot-summer day in Termez, Uzbekistan. Solar position was calculated at 15-minute resolution for 13 July 2026 using the site coordinates (37.22° N, 67.28° E) and local civil time (UTC+5). Clear-sky global horizontal irradiance was estimated with the Haurwitz model, separated into direct and diffuse components using the Erbs correlation, and transposed to tilted planes using an isotropic-sky formulation. Module temperature was calculated with the NOCT-SAM model, and DC power was estimated using a linear temperature-corrected power relationship. System 1 comprised three co-planar modules tilted 14° and facing south. System 2 comprised one east-facing, one south-facing, and one west-facing module, all tilted 14°; optical concentration and inter-module reflection were not assumed. The model placed solar noon at 12:36 local time and the maximum south-facing plane-of-array irradiance at 12:30, thereby maintaining consistency between solar geometry and irradiance. The south-facing module reached 74.5°C and a maximum DC power of 49.4 W. Daily DC energy was 428.1 Wh per south-facing module, 1284.3 Wh for System 1, and 1275.4 Wh for System 2. The east-south-west arrangement reduced the array peak by 3.0% and increased morning and evening energy by 4.5% and 8.0%, respectively, but reduced total daily energy by 0.70%. The results show that orientation diversification can flatten the production profile without necessarily increasing daily energy. Because the analysis uses a clear-sky model, a prescribed temperature profile, and constant wind speed, field measurements are required before site-specific

AUTHORS

B.Yuldoshov

"TERMIZ DAVLAT UNIVERSITETI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

A.Kholmuminov

"TERMIZ DAVLAT PEDAGOGIKA INSTITUTI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

Tags

# temperature# model# solar# geometry# diversification# photovoltaic# module# plane-of-array# irradiance# noct# azimuth# termez

SIMILAR ARTICLES

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

References

1. Dobos, A. P. (2014). PVWatts version 5 manual (NREL/TP-6A20-62641). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/1158421 2. Duffie, J. A., & Beckman, W. A. (2013). Solar engineering of thermal processes (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118671603 3. Erbs, D. G., Klein, S. A., & Duffie, J. A. (1982). Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily, and monthly-average global radiation. Solar Energy, 28(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(82)90302-4 4. Gilman, P., Dobos, A., DiOrio, N., Freeman, J., Janzou, S., & Ryberg, D. (2018). SAM photovoltaic model technical reference update (NREL/TP-6A20-67399). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/1429291 5. Haurwitz, B. (1945). Insolation in relation to cloudiness and cloud density. Journal of Meteorology, 2(3), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1945)002<0154:IIRTCA>2.0.CO;2 6. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2016). Photovoltaic (PV) module performance testing and energy rating—Part 2: Spectral responsivity, incidence angle and module operating temperature measurements (IEC 61853-2:2016). 7. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2021a). Terrestrial photovoltaic (PV) modules—Design qualification and type approval—Part 1-1: Special requirements for testing of crystalline silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules (IEC 61215-1-1:2021). 8. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2021b). Terrestrial photovoltaic (PV) modules—Design qualification and type approval—Part 1: Test requirements (IEC 61215-1:2021). 9. Klein, S. A. (1979). Calculation of monthly average insolation on tilted surfaces. Solar Energy, 19(4), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(77)90001-9 10. Reda, I., & Andreas, A. (2008). Solar position algorithm for solar radiation applications (Rev.; NREL/TP-560-34302). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/15003974