8 Sentabr 2022
55SOCIOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH AND THEIR STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
file.pdf
ARTICLE ANNOTATION
AUTHORS
N.Sabirova
O'zMU
Tags
OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL
- SYN-THESIS AND INVESTIGATION OF FORMALDEHYDE, UREA POLYMERIC LIGAND BASED ON ANILINE
Scientific Reports of Fergana State University · 14 Fevral 2023
- PEDAGOGICAL FACTORS OF PROVIDING INFORMATION SECURITY SYSTEM AND INFORMATION CULTURE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE TEACHERS IN A DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
Scientific Reports of Fergana State University · 14 Fevral 2023
- USE OF ORGANIC POLYMER BASED ON PHENOLFORMALHYDE IN OBTAINING PLASTICIZED GYPSUM
Scientific Reports of Fergana State University · 23 Yanvar 2023
- ARBA’INNAVIS TRADITION IN EASTERN HAGIOGRAPHY
Scientific Reports of Fergana State University · 23 Yanvar 2023
- THE MASTERY OF F.M. DOSTOEVSKY AND THE POETICS OF THE POLYPHONIC NOVEL
Scientific Reports of Fergana State University · 23 Yanvar 2023
- REGARDING TO THE QUESTION OF THE ESSENCE AND STRUCTURE OF THE “CONCEPT”
Scientific Reports of Fergana State University · 23 Yanvar 2023
Rate Article
Article Identifiers
DOI:
Not Available
References
1. Apte, M.L. 2001. Field Methods: Ethnographic. In Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics, R. Mesthrie (ed.), 772–775.Oxford: Elsevier.
2. Baxter, J. 2010. Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk. In Research Methods in Linguistics, L. Litosseliti (ed.), 117–137. London: Continuum.
3. Bucholtz, M. 2003. Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 398–416. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00232.
4. Creese, A. 2010. Linguistic ethnography. In Research Methods in Linguistics, L. Litosseliti (ed.), 138– 154. London: Continuum.
5. Currie, H. 1952. A projection of sociolinguistics: The relationship of speech to social status. Southern Speech Journal 18: 28–37. DOI: 10.1080/10417945209371247.
6. Figueroa, E. 1994. Sociolinguistic Metatheory. Oxford: Pergamon.
7. Fishman J. 1972. The sociology of language; an interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
8. Hazen, K. 2001. Field methods in modern dialect and variation studies. In Mesthrie (ed.), 776– 779.
9. Hymes, D.H. 1974. Anthropology and sociology. An Overview. Current Trends in Linguistics 12: 1445– 1475. Linguistic Anthropology in Society. American Anthropologist 76: 785-798.
10. Labov, W. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics, J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (eds), 28–66. Englewoods Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Labov, W. 1975b. Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In the Scope of American Linguistics, R. Austerlitz (ed.), 77–113. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
12. Robins, R.H. 1964. General Linguistics. An Introductory Survey. London: Longman (3rd. edition 1980).
13. Shuy, R.W. 1984. The decade ahead for applied sociolinguistics. The International Journal of the Sociology of Language 45: 101–111.
14. Tagliamonte, S.A. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
15. Trudgill, P.J. 1983b. On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Trudgill, P.J. 1978. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, P.J. Trudgill (ed.), 1–18. London: Edward Arnold.