278

Ushbu maqolada Toshkent viloyati hududida joylashgan ko‘chmanchi chorvadorlarga taalluqli So‘ngak mozor- qo‘rg‘onida o‘tkazilgan arxeologik tadqiqotlar va uni davrlashtirilishi masalalari bayon qilingan. Ushbu arxeologik yodgorlik Qovunchi madaniyatining III bosqichiga to‘g‘ri keladi. Ta’kidlash kerakki, bu paytda Chotqol daryosi havzasi orqali Talas vodiysi va Yettisuv hududlari bilan madaniy aloqalar shakllanib, u joylardan vohaning shimoli-sharqiy qismlariga yangi etnik guruhlar ham kirib kelgan. Natijada Chorvoq hududida VI-VIII asrlardan qo‘nar-ko‘char jamoalarning o‘troqlashuv jarayoni tezlashgan. Keyingi paytlarda, mutaxassis arxeologlar tomonidan yetarlicha o‘rganilmagan Chorvoq hududini muallif tomonidan arxeologik jihatdan qayta o‘rganish ayrim yangi fikr-mulohazalarni ilgari surilishiga sabab bo‘lgan.

  • Web Address
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol28_iss3/a17
  • Date of creation in the UzSCI system30-09-2022
  • Read count258
  • Date of publication23-09-2022
  • Main LanguageO'zbek
  • Pages92-97
Ўзбек

Ushbu maqolada Toshkent viloyati hududida joylashgan ko‘chmanchi chorvadorlarga taalluqli So‘ngak mozor- qo‘rg‘onida o‘tkazilgan arxeologik tadqiqotlar va uni davrlashtirilishi masalalari bayon qilingan. Ushbu arxeologik yodgorlik Qovunchi madaniyatining III bosqichiga to‘g‘ri keladi. Ta’kidlash kerakki, bu paytda Chotqol daryosi havzasi orqali Talas vodiysi va Yettisuv hududlari bilan madaniy aloqalar shakllanib, u joylardan vohaning shimoli-sharqiy qismlariga yangi etnik guruhlar ham kirib kelgan. Natijada Chorvoq hududida VI-VIII asrlardan qo‘nar-ko‘char jamoalarning o‘troqlashuv jarayoni tezlashgan. Keyingi paytlarda, mutaxassis arxeologlar tomonidan yetarlicha o‘rganilmagan Chorvoq hududini muallif tomonidan arxeologik jihatdan qayta o‘rganish ayrim yangi fikr-mulohazalarni ilgari surilishiga sabab bo‘lgan.

Русский

В данной статье рассмотрены вопросы археологических раскопок и  периодизация могильника Сунгак, который принадлежит кочевым скотоводам Ташкентской области. Этот археологический памятник относится к  III этапе Каунчинской культуры. Надо отметит, в это время формировались культурные связи с Таласской долиной и Семиречье через бассейн реки Чаткал, откуда в северо-восточные части оазиса проникали новые этнические группы. В результате процесс расселения кочевых общин в Чарвакском регионе ускорился с VI-VIII вв. В последнее время проведенное автором археологическое рассмотрение Чарвакского микрооазиса, недостаточно изученного специалистами-археологами, привело к развитию некоторых новых идей.

English

This article discusses the issues of archaeological excavations and periodization of the Sungak burial ground, which belongs to the nomadic pastoralists of the Tashkent region. This archaeological monument belongs to the III stage of the Kaunchi culture. It should be noted that at that time cultural ties were formed with the Talas Valley and Semirechye through the Chatkal River basin, from where new ethnic groups penetrated into the northeastern parts of the oasis. As a result, the process of settlement of nomadic communities in the Charvak region accelerated from the 6th-8th centuries. Recently, the author's archaeological new research of the Charvak microoasis, which has not been sufficiently studied by archaeologists, has led to the development of some new ideas.

№ Name of reference
1 1. Abramova M.P. Podkumskiy mogilnik. – Moskva. 1987. – S. 119. (Abramova M.P. Podkumsky burial ground. Moscow. 1987. P. 119)
2 2. Buryakov Yu. F. Genezis i etapi razvitiya gorodskoy kulturi Tashkentskogo oazisa. – Tashkent. 1982. – S. 100.
3 (Buryakov Yu. F. Genesis and stages of development of the urban culture of the Tashkent oasis. Tashkent. 1982. P. 100)
4 3. Grigor’ev G. V. Kaunchi-Tepa (Raskopki 1935 g.). – Tashkent. 1940. (Grigoriev G.V. Kaunchi-Tepa (Excavations in 1935). Tashkent. 1940).
5 4. Gryaznov M.P. Istoriya drevnix plemen Verxney Obi po raskopkam bliz s. Bolshaya rechka / MIA, 1956. № 48, tabl. XLI, 12. (Gryaznov M.P. The history of the ancient tribes of the Upper Ob according to excavations near the village “Bolshaya rechka” // MIA, 1956. No. 48, tab. XLI, 12).
6 5. Levina L. M. Keramika nijney i sredney techenii Sыrdari v 1 tis. n.e. – Moskva. 1971. (Levina L. M. Ceramics of the lower and middle reaches of the Syrdari in 1000 AD. Moscow, 1971)
7 6. Litvinskiy B.A. Orudiya truda i utvar iz mogilnikov Zapadnoy Fergani. – Moskva. 1978. (Litvinsky B. A. Tools and utensils from the burials of Western Fergana. Moscow, 1978)
8 7. Rudenko S.I. Sibirskaya kolleksiya Petra I. SAI, DZ-9. – Moskva, – Leningrad. 1962. – S. 22-23,36, tabl. II. 1, 3. (Rudenko S.I. Siberian collection Petr I. SAI, DZ-9. Moscow, Leningrad. 1962. P. 22-23,36, tab. II. 1, 3.)
9 8. Sibirskiye drevnosti / Arxeologiya SSSR. – Moskva, 1988. Tom 18. – S. 42, 128-129. Ris. 23.15 (Siberian antiquities. Archeology of the USSR. Moscow, 1988. Volume 18, P. 42, 128-129. Pic. 23.15)
10 9. Smirnov A.P. Ocherki drevney i srednevekovoy istorii narodov Srednego Povoljya i Prikamya / MIA, № 28, 1952, – S. 80, tabl. XVII. 11. (Smirnov A.P. Essays on the ancient and medieval history of the peoples of the Middle Volga and Kama. MIA, No. 28, 1952, - S. 80, tab. XVII. 11).
11 Jurnallar
12 10. Agzamxodjayev T. Tuyabuguzskiye nausi // IMKU, Vip. 3, – Tashkent. 1962. – S. 75 (Agzamkhodzhaev T. Naus’s of Tuyabuguz // HMCU, Issue 3, Tashkent. 1962)
13 11. Kojomberdieva E. I. Ob oriyentirovke pogrebalnыx soorujeniy kenkolskoy kulturi // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Ser. 8. Istoriya, № 1. – Moskva. 1995. (Kozhomberdieva E.I. On the orientation of the burial structures of the Kenkol culture // Bulletin of Moscow University, Ser. 8. History, No 1. Moscow, 1995)
14 12. Smagulov YE. Katakombniy mogilnik Choon-Kapka I v doline r. Talas // IMKU, № 34. – Tashkent. 2004. (Smagulov E. Choon-Kapka I catacomb burial place in the valley of the river Talas // HMCU, No 34. Tashkent. 2004)
15 Ikki va undan ortiq mualliflar
16 13. Gorbunova N.G., Gamburg B.Z. Ak-Tamskiy mogilnik // KSIIMK. 1957. Vip. 69. – S. 78-90 (Gorbunova N.G., Hamburg V.Z. Ak-Tam burial ground // KSIIMK, 1957. Issue 69. Pp. 78-90).
17 14. Murodaliyev R., Mirsoatova S. So‘ngak mozor-qo‘rg‘oni topilmasi va uzangining tarixdagi ahamiyati // O‘tmishga nazar, 4-jild. № 9. 2021. – B. 34-43. (Murodaliyev R., Mirsoatova S. The find from Sungak burials and significance of the stirrups in history // Look to the past, vol. № 9. 2021. Pp. 34-43)
18 15. Maksud F., Muradaliyev R. Göktürkler ve üzenginin yayilmasi üzerine // Genel Türk tarihi araştirmalari dergisi. Cilt/Volume 2, Sayı/Issue 4, Temmuz /July 2020, – SS. 287-302. (Maksudov F., Muradaliyev R. On the Kükturks and the spread of the stirrup // Journal of General Turkish History Studies. Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2020. Pp. 287-302)
19 Ilmiy anjuman to‘plamlari
20 16. Murodaliyev R. Suyakdan ishlangan bir buyum xususida // O‘rta Osiyo tarixi va arxeologiyasi (Tarix, arxeologiya, turizm, etnografiya va ijtimoiy sohalarga oid ilmiy, ilmiy-ommabop maqolalar to‘plami), Tom 1. – Termiz. 2022. – B. 108-111. (Murodaliyev R. On a piece of bone // History and archeology of Central Asia (Collection of scientific, popular scientific articles on history, archeology, tourism, ethnography and social spheres), Volume 1. Termez, 2022. Pp. 108- 111)
21 17. Murodaliyev R.H. O‘rta Osiyoning antik davr katakomba qabrlarining o‘rganilishi // O‘zbekiston arxeologiyasining dolzarb masalalari (Professor M.D. Djuraqulovning arxeologiya maktabi) mavzusidagi konferensiya materiallari. – Samarqand. 2022. – B. 114-119. (Murodaliyev R.H. Study of ancient catacomb tombs in Central Asia // Proceedings of the conference on current issues of archeology of Uzbekistan (School of Archeology of Professor MD Djurakulov). Samarkand. 2022. Pp. 114-119).
Waiting