Rossiya imperiyasining mustamlakachilik siyosati natijasida O‘rta Osiyo xalqlarining faol migratsiyasi kuzatilgan, biroq mintaqa xalqlari tarixining mazkur masalasi hali-hamon mahalliy tarixchi olimlar tomonidan to‘liq o‘rganilmagan. Bu mavzuda xorijda amalga oshirilgan tadqiqotlar esa turli mafkuraviy qarashlar sabab o‘quvchilar uchun xolis axborotni bera olmaydi. Mazkur maqolada O‘rta Osiyo xalqlari migratsiyasining g‘arb va mahalliy tarixchi olimlar tomonidan o‘rganilishining tarixshunoslik tahlili amalga oshirilgan.
Rossiya imperiyasining mustamlakachilik siyosati natijasida O‘rta Osiyo xalqlarining faol migratsiyasi kuzatilgan, biroq mintaqa xalqlari tarixining mazkur masalasi hali-hamon mahalliy tarixchi olimlar tomonidan to‘liq o‘rganilmagan. Bu mavzuda xorijda amalga oshirilgan tadqiqotlar esa turli mafkuraviy qarashlar sabab o‘quvchilar uchun xolis axborotni bera olmaydi. Mazkur maqolada O‘rta Osiyo xalqlari migratsiyasining g‘arb va mahalliy tarixchi olimlar tomonidan o‘rganilishining tarixshunoslik tahlili amalga oshirilgan.
В резултате колониолной политики Российской империи наблюдалось активное переселение народов Средней Азии, однако этот вопрос истории народов региона еше не до конца изучен местными историками. Исследования, проводимые по этой теме за рубежом, не могут предоставить студентам обьективную информацию из-за разных идеологических взглядов. В данной статье проводится историографически й анализ изучения миграции народов Средней Азии западными и местными историками.
As a result of the colonial policy of the Russian Empire, the active migration of the peoples of Central Asia was observed, but this issue of the history of the peoples of the region has not yet been fully studied by local historians. Researches conducted abroad on this topic cannot provide unbiased information for students due to different ideological views. In this article, a historiographical analysis of the study of the migration of Central Asian peoples by Western and local historians is carried out.
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jo'rayev M.X. | Katta o‘qituvchi | Denov tadbirkorlik va pedagogika instituti |
| 2 | Mamarajabov B.N. | Katta o‘qituvchi | Denov tadbirkorlik va pedagogika instituti |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | Baljuvoni, Muhammad Ali. Ta’rikh-iNofe’-i. – Dushanbe: Irfon, 1994. |
| 2 | Abdullaev, Kamoludin. ‘Central Asian Émigrés in Afghanistan: First Wave (1918–1932)’. In Central Asia Monitor, 4 and 5 (1994). – 20 б. |
| 3 | https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0114/ch1.xhtml |
| 4 | Manja Stephan-Emmrich and Philipp Schröder, eds., Mobilities, Boundaries, and Travelling Ideas: Rethinking Translocality Beyond Central Asia and the Caucasus. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0114 |
| 5 | Masud, Muhammad K. The Obligation to Migrate: The Doctrine of hijra in Islamic Law. In Dale Eickelman and James Piscatori, eds. Muslim Travellers: Pilgrimage, Migration, and the Religious Imagination. – Berkley: University of California Press, 1990. – P. 29. |
| 6 | Balci, Bayram. ‘Central Asian Refugees in Saudi Arabia: Religious Evolution and Contributing to the Reislamization of Their Motherland’. Refugee Survey Quarterly 26.2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdi0223 |
| 7 | Eickelman, Dale; James, Piscatori. ‘Social Theory in the Study of Muslim Societies’. In Dale Eickelman and James Piscatori, eds. Muslim Travellers: Pilgrimage, Migration, and the Religious Imagination. – Berkley: University of California Press, 1990. – P. 3-28. |
| 8 | Minault, Gail. The Khilafat Movement: Religious Symbolism and Political Mobilization in India. – New York: Columbia University Press, 1982. |
| 9 | Abdullaev, Kamoludin. Ot Sintsiana do Khorasana. iz Istorii Sredneaziatskoi Emigratsii 20 veka. – Dushanbe: Irfon, 2009. 451-70, 510-12. |
| 10 | Shalinsky, Audrey C. Long Years of Exile: Central Asian Refugees in Afghanistan and Pakistan. – Lanham: University Press of America, 1993. – P. 27-29. |