logo
calendar24 Fevral 2026
view25
Main language:Uzbek

Methodological Approaches of Muslim Scholars to the Study of Religions

Field of Science:Religious StudiesCultural StudiesLinguistics and Language
pdf

9_e8b72137.pdf

PDF

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This article provides a comprehensive historical, theoretical, and methodological analysis of the methods employed by Muslim scholars in the study of religions. The research examines the sources and stages of development of approaches to the study of religions that emerged within the Islamic scholarly tradition, as well as their role and significance in contemporary religious studies. Particular attention is given to the issue of attitudes toward other religions in the Qur’an and Hadith, as well as to the views of early Muslim scholars, which were grounded in the principles of scholarly objectivity and tolerance. Furthermore, based on the works of great Muslim thinkers such as Abu Rayhan Beruni, Al-Shahrastani, Ibn Hazm, Al-Farabi, and Ibn Sina, the essence and characteristics of various methodological approaches—including historical-comparative, source-based, philological-analytical, rational-philosophical, empirical, and phenomenological methods—are examined and elucidated. The methods employed by Muslim scholars in the study of religions are comparatively analyzed alongside the methodologies of Western religious studies, and their significance for contemporary religious research, interfaith dialogue, and the promotion of religious tolerance is substantiated.

AUTHORS

M.Ibrohimova

"O`ZBEKISTON XALQARO ISLOM AKADEMIYASI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

Tags

# source studies# Abu Rayhan al-Biruni# Muslim scholars# study of religions# methodology of religious studies# al-Shahrastani# Ahmad Shalabi# approaches of contemporary Muslim scholars

SIMILAR ARTICLES

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

References

Abduhalimov B. (2002). Abu Rayhon Beruniy / Buyuk allomalarimiz. – Toshkent: Toshkent Islom universiteti.

Abu Rayhon Beruniy. (1995). Hindiston. Tarjima: A. B. Xalidov, Yu. N. Zavadovskiy. // Tanlangan asarlari, Tom II. Toshkent: Fan, 1963. Qayta nashr: M.: Ladomir.

Adam Mez. (1997). Musulmon renessansi. – Toshkent: Fan.

Mukhamedov, N., & Turambetov, N. METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED BY AL BERUNI IN THE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS SYSTEMS // Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research ISSN: 2278-4853 Vol. 12, Issue 12, December 2023 SJIF 2022 = 8.179 -P.105-110.

Shalabiy, Ahmad. (1960). Muqaranat al-adyon. – Qohira: Maktabat an-Nahda al-Misriyya.

Encyclopaedia of Islam, New Edition. (2000). "Shalabī, Aḥmad." – Leiden: Brill.

Fazlur Rahman. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

George Makdisi. (1981). The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ibn Hazm al-Andalusiy. (1985). Al-Fasl fi al-milal va al-ahvo va an-nihal. – Bayrut: Dar al-Jil.

Jacques Waardenburg. (1999). Muslim Perceptions of Other Religions. – Oxford: Oxford University Press.

John L. Esposito. (2010). Islam: The Straight Path. – New York: Oxford University Press.

Khaled Abou El Fadl. (2002). The Place of Tolerance in Islam. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Marshall G. S. Hodgson. (1974). The Venture of Islam. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Muhammad Arkoun. (1994). Rethinking Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers. – Boulder: Westview Press.

Muhammad Arkoun. (1994). Rethinking Islamic Studies. – London: Routledge.

Shahristoniy, Muhammad ibn Abdulkarim. (1992). Al-Milal va an-nihal. – Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.

W. Montgomery Watt. (1985). Islamic Philosophy and Theology. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.