logo
calendar20 Fevral 2026
view23
Asosiy til:Ingliz

Zamonaviy sud-lingvistik tadqiqotlarda ilmiy usullarning metodologik va tahliliy yondashuvlari

Fan yo'nalishi:Til va tilshunoslikMadaniyatshunoslik ​Tilshunoslik va til
pdf

Ashurov_B.SH._theory_of....pdf

PDF

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Ushbu maqolada zamonaviy sud lingvistikasi tadqiqotlarida qo‘llaniladigan uslubiy va tahliliy yondashuvlar tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot zamonaviy sud lingvistikasining asosiy masalalaridan biri — tilni yuridik dalil sifatida o‘rganishning ishonchli usullarini tanlashga qaratilgan. Tadqiqotning dolzarbligi yuridik amaliyotda lingvistik ekspertizaning ahamiyati tobora ortib borayotgani bilan belgilanadi, chunki uslubiy aniqlik ekspert xulosalarining asosliligiga bevosita ta’sir ko‘rsatadi. Maqolaning maqsadi sud lingvistikasida qo‘llaniladigan asosiy uslubiy asoslarni tizimlashtirish va baholashdan iborat bo‘lib, ularning nazariy negizlari va amaliy qo‘llanilishiga alohida e’tibor qaratiladi. Diskurs tahlili, uslubiy tahlil va pragmatik talqin kabi an’anaviy sifat usullari bilan korpus lingvistikasi va hisoblash texnikasiga asoslangan miqdoriy yondashuvlarning o‘zaro aloqasiga alohida e’tibor berilgan. Tadqiqotning yangiligi sud lingvistikasini lingvistik, yuridik va tahliliy jihatlarni o‘z ichiga olgan fanlararo soha sifatida ko‘rib chiqadigan yaxlit yondashuvida namoyon bo‘ladi. Bu yondashuv zamonaviy uslubiy tendensiyalarni, jumladan, gibrid tadqiqot modellaridan foydalanishning kengayishini aniqlash imkonini beradi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, zamonaviy sud lingvistikasi tobora ko‘proq talqiniy va empirik usullarning uyg‘unligiga tayanmoqda, bu esa lingvistik tahlilning daliliy qiymati va ishonchliligini oshirmoqda. Shu bilan birga, standartlashtirish, ekspert kompetensiyasi va raqamli kommunikatsiya tahlili bilan bog‘liq uslubiy muammolar ham yoritilgan. Maqolada zamonaviy huquqiy tizimlarda sud lingvistikasining ilmiy va amaliy asoslarini mustahkamlash uchun izchil va uslubiy jihatdan asoslangan tahliliy asoslarni yanada rivojlantirish zarurligi ta’kidlanadi.

MUALLIFLAR

B.Ashurov

"O`ZBEKISTON DAVLAT JAHON TILLARI UNIVERSITETI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

Teglar

# tadqiqot metodologiyasi# lingvistik ekspertiza# sud lingvistikasi# tahliliy yondashuvlar# yuridik diskurs

O'XSHASH MAQOLALAR

SHU JURNALDAGI BOSHQA MAQOLALAR

Maqolani baholang

0
0 ta baho
5
4
3
2
1

Maqola idintifikatorlari

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Wright, D. (2021) Corpus approaches to forensic linguistics. In M. Coulthard, A. May and R. Sousa-Silva (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (2nd edn). London: Routledge. — P. 611–627.

Базылев, В. Н. (2022). Методологические проблемы при исследовании продуктов речевой деятельности в судебной лингвистической экспертизе, Вестник Академии права и управления, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (69), – P. 6–14.

Батюшкина, М. В. (2016). Лингвистическая и правовая модели классификации лингвистических экспертиз, Политическая лингвистика, Vol. 6, Issue 1, — С. 222–230.

Бринев, К. И. (2021). Основные методологические проблемы судебной лингвистической экспертизы: связь теоретических и прикладных исследований, Язык, право, общество: сборник научных статей IV Международной научно-практической конференции, Vol. 6, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.55. С. 110–113.

Галяшина, Е. И. (2003). Методологические основы судебного речеведения [Doctoral dissertation, Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова]. — C. 23.

Иванов, П. К. (2021). Лингвистическая экспертиза: структура документа и компетенции лингвиста-эксперта, Юридическая лингвистика, Vol. 5, Issue 1, — С. 10–24.

Кузнецов В. О. (2022). Методы судебной лингвистической экспертизы (Methods of Forensic Linguistics), Теория и практика судебной экспертизы, 17(4). — C. 6–17.

Кусов, Г. В. (2011). Общие и частные задачи методологии судебной лингвистической экспертизы, Теория и практика общественного развития, Vol. 4, Issue 7, — C. 95–102.

Надеина, Т. М., & Чубина, Е. А. (2019). Forensic linguistics and judicial speech studies: Correlation of objects and subject areas, Philology Theory & Practice, Vol. 12, Issue 4, — P. 263–269 https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.55

Смирнов, А. В. (2020). Современная теоретическая лингвистика и судебная экспертиза, Higher School of Economics Publications, – С. 1–30.

Bazylev, V. N. (2022). Metodologicheskie problemy pri issledovanii produktov rechevoj dejatel'nosti v sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertize. (Methodological problems in the study of speech products in forensic linguistic examination). Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya, 3(1 (69)), 6–14.

Batyushkina, M. V. (2016). Lingvisticheskaya i pravovaya modeli klassifikatsii lingvisticheskikh ekspertiz. (Linguistic and legal models for the classification of linguistic examinations). Politicheskaya lingvistika, 6(1), 222–230.

Brinev, K. I. (2021). Osnovnye metodologicheskie problemy sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy: svyaz' teoreticheskikh i prikladnykh issledovanij. (Main methodological problems of forensic linguistic examination: The connection between theoretical and applied research). In Yazyk, pravo, obshchestvo: sbornik nauchnykh statej IV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii, 6(1), 110–113.

Galyashina, E. I. (2003). Metodologicheskie osnovy sudebnogo rechevedeniya (Methodological foundations of forensic speech studies) [Doktorskaya dissertatsiya, Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet imeni M. V. Lomonosova]. 23.

Ivanov, P. K. (2021). Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza: struktura dokumenta i kompetentsii lingvista-eksperta. (Linguistic expertise: Structure of the document and competencies of the forensic linguist). Yuridicheskaya lingvistika, 5(1), 10–24.

Kuznetsov, V. O. (2022). Metody sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy. (Methods of forensic linguistic examination). Teoriya i praktika sudebnoj ekspertizy, 17(4), 6–17.

Kusov, G. V. (2011). Obshchie i chastnye zadachi metodologii sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy. (General and specific tasks of the methodology of forensic linguistic examination). Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 4 (7), 95–102.

Nadeina, T. M., & Chubina, E. A. (2019). Forensic linguistics and judicial speech studies: Correlation of objects and subject areas. (Forensic linguistics and judicial speech studies: Correlation of objects and subject areas). Philology. Theory & Practice, 12(4), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.55

Smirnov, A. V. (2020). Sovremennaya teoreticheskaya lingvistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza. (Modern theoretical linguistics and forensic examination). Higher School of Economics Publications, 1–30.

Wasi, M., Zaki, S., & Anwar, R. H. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of research in forensic linguistics, SAGE Open, Vol. 14, Issue 4, — P. 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241299280

Al-Amr, M. M., & Atwell, E. (2020). Forensic linguistic analysis using computational methods, Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON), Vol. 1, Issue 1, – P. 291–300.

Ariani M. G., Sajedi F., Sajedi M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 158. — P. 222–225.

Coulthard, M. (2017). Forensic linguistics, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 24, Issue 1, — P. 1–15.

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence, Routledge, — P. 1–250.

Durant, A., & Leung, J. H. C. (2016). Techniques in forensic linguistics, Language and Law: A Resource Book for Students, Chapter B9, — P. 96–100. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315436258-21

Fobbe, E. (2020). Text-linguistic analysis in forensic authorship attribution, International Journal of Language & Law (JLL), 9. – P. 93–114. https://doi.org/10.14762/jll.2020.093

Helmi, R., Maulina, S., & Mardhatillah, F. (2025). Forensic linguistics in legal contexts: Examining plagiarism, legal documents, and defamation, British World Multilingual Studies. Beyond Words, Vol. 13, Issue 1, – P. 27–41.

Heydon, G. (2019). Researching forensic linguistics: Approaches and applications, Routledge, — P. 1–256 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290640

Ismoilov, K. (2025). Forensic linguistics: Analysis of modern approaches, Oriental Journal of Philology, Vol. 5, Issue 07, — P. 173–183.

Kusumawardhani, P. (2024). Forensic linguistics and legal language analysis, Journal of Linguistic Research, Vol. 10, Issue 2, — P. 45–60.

Kusumawardhani, P. (2024). Language and forensic linguistics, International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, Issue 1, — P. 48–53.

Mani, R. T., Palimar, V., Pai, M. S., Shwetha, T. S., & Krishnan, M. N. (2025). An evolution of forensic linguistics: From manual analysis to machine learning — A narrative review, Forensic Science International: Reports, Vol. 11, — P. 100417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100417

Nini, A. (2015). Authorship attribution in forensic linguistics, Aston University, PhD Thesis, – P. 1–260.

Nowak, P. (2021). Legal and forensic linguistic methods, Comparative Legilinguistics, Vol. 45, Issue 1, – P. 1–15.

Ntelu A., Musa D. T., & Muassomah M. (2025). The role of forensic linguistics in investigating and uncovering language crimes on social media. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, — P. 283-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.31

Sharipov, S. B. (2025). Sovet va zamonaviy o‘zbek tilshunosligida metodologiya muammosi, Modern Science and Research, Vol. 3, Issue 2, — P. 112–119

Solan, L. M. (2013). Language and law: The linguistic foundations of legal interpretation, Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 71, Issue 1, — P. 1–36.

Thamer, A. A. (2025). Forensic linguistic analysis of authorship identification of selected anonymous comments on ‘Gaza attack’ in Threads social media application, Journal of Education College Wasit University, 58(1). — P. 501-512. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol58.Iss1.4186

To‘rayeva, D. A. (2024). Shaxsiy yozishmalar lingvistik ekspertizasida metodologiya masalasi, Zenodo Conference Papers, Vol. 1, Issue 1, – P. 427–433. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11110814