logo
calendar17 Sentabr 2026
view48
Main language:English

METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE STUDY OF THE OPPOSITION OF DEFINITENESS AND INDEFINITENESS

Field of Science:Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
National field of science (HAC):05.01.01 — Engineering geometry and computer graphics. Audio and video technologies05.01.09 — Document studies. Archival science. Library science05.06.04 — Garment technology and costume design07.00.07 — Ethnography, ethnology and anthropology07.00.02 — History of science and technology07.00.01 — History of Uzbekistan07.00.03 — World history07.00.04 — Religious studies07.00.05 — History of international relations and foreign policy07.00.06 — Archaeology09.00.01 — Ontology, epistemology and logic09.00.03 — History of philosophy09.00.04 — Social philosophy09.00.05 — Technologies of national idea advocacy09.00.06 — History and methodology of ideas09.00.07 — History and theory of spirituality09.00.08 — Spiritual education09.00.09 — Spiritual processes and technologies10.00.01 — Uzbek language10.00.02 — Uzbek literature10.00.03 — Karakalpak language10.00.04 — Languages and literatures of the peoples of Europe, America and Australia10.00.05 — Languages and literatures of the peoples of Asia and Africa10.00.06 — Comparative literature, contrastive linguistics and translation studies10.00.07 — Literary theory10.00.08 — Folklore studies10.00.12 — Karakalpak literature17.00.04 — Fine and decorative applied arts17.00.01 — Theatre arts17.00.05 — Theory and history of design17.00.02 — Musical arts17.00.03 — Cinema arts. Television17.00.06 — Museum studies. Conservation, restoration and preservation of historical and cultural objects18.00.01 — Theory and history of architecture. Restoration and reconstruction of architectural monuments17.00.07 — Theory and history of culture. Cultural studies17.00.08 — Theory and history of art18.00.02 — Zoning. Urban planning. Planning of rural settlements. Landscape architecture. Architecture of buildings and structures19.00.07 — Psychology of religion21.02.22 — Military history24.00.02 — Quranic studies. Hadith studies24.00.01 — History of Islam and source studies24.00.03 — Fiqh, kalam. Theology24.00.04 — Classical Oriental literature and source studies07.00.08 — Historiography, source studies and methods of historical research09.00.02 — Philosophy of forms of consciousness, culture and practice (by designation)10.00.09 — Journalism10.00.10 — Textual criticism and literary source studies10.00.11 — Language theory. Applied and computational linguistics
pdf

22-28_bb9154b2.pdf

PDF

Problems of modern philology

Problems of modern philology

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
The article examines the methodological foundations of the study of the opposition of definiteness and indefiniteness. The main approaches to this category are compared, and the principles of its structural, semantic and pragmatic analysis are substantiated.

AUTHORS

Science ID: FNM-0826-0016

Tags

# article# definiteness# indefiniteness# opposition# reference# familiarity# uniqueness# markedness# comparative method

SIMILAR ARTICLES

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

References

Abbott B. Definiteness and indefiniteness // The handbook of pragmatics / eds. L. R. Horn, G. Ward. – Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. – P. 122-149.

Christophersen P. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. – Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard, 1939. – P. 205.

Gundel J. K., Hedberg N., Zacharski R. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. – Language, 1993. – Vol. 69(2). – P. 274-307.

Hawkins J. A. Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. – London: Croom Helm, 1978. – P. 316.

Jespersen O. The philosophy of grammar. – London: George Allen and Unwin, 1924. – P. 359.

Löbner S. Definites. – Journal of Semantics, 1985. – Vol. 4(4). – P. 279-326.

Lyons C. Definiteness. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 380.

Prince E. F. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information // Radical pragmatics / ed. P. Cole. – New York: Academic Press, 1981. – P. 223-255.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. – London: Longman, 1985. – P. 1779.

Russell B. On denoting. – Mind, 1905. – Vol. 14(56). – P. 479-493.

Strawson P. F. On referring. – Mind, 1950. – Vol. 59(235). – P. 320-344.

Trubetskoy N. S. Principles of phonology. – Moscow: Izdatelstvo inostrannoy literatury, 1960. – P. 372.