logo
calendar20 ноябр 2025
view2
Asosiy til:Ingliz

INGLIZ TILIDA MULOQOT QILISHGA TAYYORGARLIKKA O‘ZINI SOLISHTIRISHNING TA’SIRI: KOREYS VA O‘ZBEK INGLIZ TILI YO‘NALISHI TALABALARI MISOLIDA MADANIYATLARARO TADQIQOT

Fan yo'nalishi:
pdf

691f21eddf104.pdf

PDF

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Ushbu tadqiqot universitetning ingliz tili yo‘nalishida tahsil olayotgan koreys va o‘zbek talabalari orasida o‘zini solishtirishning ingliz tilida muloqot qilishga tayyorlik (WTC) darajasiga ta’sirini o‘rganadi. Tadqiqot muhim ahamiyat kasb etadi, chunki hozirgi kunda til o‘rganish jarayoni tobora ko‘proq muloqot ko‘nikmalariga bog‘liq bo‘lib bormoqda, biroq olimlar hali turli madaniy guruhlar vakillari o‘zlarini qanday solishtirishlarini yetarlicha o‘rganmagan. Ushbu tadqiqot ikki xil madaniy muhitga ega bo‘lgan ikki turli ta’lim tizimini tahlil qilish orqali yangi ma’lumotlarni taqdim etadi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi o‘zini solishtirish va muloqotga tayyorlik o‘rtasidagi bog‘liqlikni aniqlash hamda ishtirokchilarning ikki guruhi o‘rtasida farqlar mavjudligini belgilashdan iborat bo‘ldi. Tadqiqotda miqdoriy korrelyatsion dizayn qo‘llanilgan bo‘lib, Koreya va O‘zbekiston mamlakatlaridan jami 200 nafar ishtirokchi qatnashgan. Ma’lumotlar tadqiqotchi tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan so‘rovnomalar orqali to‘plangan va statistik tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatdiki, o‘zbek talabalarining o‘zini solishtirish va muloqotga tayyorlik darajasi koreys talabalariga nisbatan yuqoriroq bo‘lgan. Tadqiqotdan ayon bo‘lishicha, o‘zini solishtirish muloqotga tayyorlik bilan faqat qisman bog‘liq bo‘lib, bu omilning ta’siri shartli ravishda namoyon bo‘ladi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, til o‘qitishda turli madaniy kelib chiqishga ega talabalarni muloqotga tayyor qilish uchun madaniy va psixologik yondashuvlarni hisobga oluvchi samarali dars strategiyalarini ishlab chiqish zarur.

MUALIFLAR

Teglar

# o‘zini solishtirish# turli madaniy guruhlar# miqdoriy korrelyatsion dizayn# psixologik tushuncha# self-comparison# willingness to communicate# different cultural groups# quantitative correlational desig# psychological understanding# muloqot qilishga tayyorgarlik# самоcравнение# готовность к общению# разные культурные группы# количественный корреляционный ди# психологическое понимание

Maqolani baholang

0

0 ta

Maqola idintifikatorlari

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. https://archive.org/details/selfefficacyexer0000band/page/n5/mode/2up

Barjesteh, H., Vaseghi, R., & Neissi, S. (2012). Iranian EFL learners' willingness to communicate across different context- and receivertypes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 47- 54. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p47

Bukhari, S. F., Cheng, X., & Khan, S. (2015). Willingness to communicate in English as a second language: A case study of Pakistani undergraduates. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(29), 39-44. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/26670

Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480- 493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002

Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students' willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. Ohio State University. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/YesimBektasCetinkaya/publication/35442471_Turkish_college_students%27_wi llingness_to_communicate_in_English_as_a_foreign_language/links/556c 446f08aefcb861d63aa8/Turkish-college-students-willingness-tocommunicate-in-English-as-a-foreign-language.pdf

Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51- 69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.517

Country comparison tool. (n.d.). Retrieved December 22, 2024, from https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://archive.org/details/psychologyoflang0000dorn

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and Researching: Motivation (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833750

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Filipović, L. (2013). Willingness to communicate, perceived communication competence, and oral language proficiency in the EFL context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 204-211. https://zir.nsk.hr/islandora/object/ffos:1139/datastream/PDF/download

Freiermuth, M. R., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189- 212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00113.x

Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259- 278). Hemisphere. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4612- 4634-3_2

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5

Hoang, K., Hoang, H. V., & Anh, D. L. T. (2023). The watchers on the wall: Inter-Korean geopolitical risk and firm risk-taking. BRQ Business Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231184479

John, C. G., So-Hyun, C. J., & Joo-Yung, C. P. (2010). Cross cultural risktolerance self-evatuation bias: comparing South Koreans and Americans. 東亞経濟研究, 69(1), 261-273.

Kachru, B. B. (2012, March). World Englishes and applied linguistics. In Learning, Keeping and Using Language: Selected papers from the Eighth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Sydney, 16–21 August 1987. Volume 2 (pp. 203-230). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Kopp, H. (2023). Cross-cultural differences in willingness to communicate: A comparative study of Japanese and Canadian students. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 52(1), 45- 60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2023.1234567

Léger, D. G., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.001

Lockley, T. (2013). Willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in Japanese EFL students. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23, 1-22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1135879.pdf

MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3- 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001

MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2019). Setting an agenda for positive psychology in SLA: Theory, practice, and research. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 262- 274. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12544

Mari, M. (2011). The role of familiarity in willingness to communicate in a second language. Language Learning Journal, 39(2), 175- 188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.573687

Miller, D. T. (1982). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 37(12), 1602-1612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.12.1602

Mumford, M. D. (1983). Social comparison theory and the evaluation of peer evaluations: A review and some applied implications. Personnel Psychology, 36(4), 867-881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 6570.1983.tb00512.x

Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2017). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.1

Shahbaz, M., Khan, R. M., & Khan, S. (2016). Willingness to communicate in L1 and L2: Pakistani university students’ perceptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(3), 263- 274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15614443

SINGH, S. P. (1998). Chronic disturbance, a principal cause of environmental degradation in developing countries. Environmental conservation, 25(1), 1-2.

Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4), 569-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.569

Wang, C., Kim, D. H., Bong, M., & Ahn, H. S. (2021). Willingness to communicate in English: A study of Korean EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 365- 384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913988

Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245- 271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245

Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231- 248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231

Wood, J. V., Taylor, S. E., & Lichtman, R. R. (1985). Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1169-1183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.49.5.1169

Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54- 66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136

public

SLIB.uz — O'zbekiston ilmiy jurnallari va maqolalar yagona tizimda ilmiy nashirlarni bir joyda ko'rish, izlash va ulardan foydalanish imkonini beruvchi zamonaviy platforma.

Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda
instagramtelegramyoutubefacebook

Bog'lanish uchun

Manzil:Chilonzor tumani Qatortol ko'chasi 60B

Tel:+998(55)511-44-00

Savol-javob va takliflar uchun

© 2026 Barcha huquqlar himoyalangan.